Ignore return value from eglinfo - it doesn't indicate failure.
Discovered when using an X11 system where Wayland is not available. It
returns 1 in this case, but the output is still valid. Confirmed by
looking at the eglinfo source - we should parse the output regardless of
what it returns.
Catch exception correctly when eglinfo is not installed.
Fixes for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/163980
I have attempted to cherry pick some useful information from eglinfo
which is often requested when resolving issues with rendering.
This information is not required to compile an Flutter application, so
it is a little different to the other displayed information.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160257.
~~This will sit on CI for a bit and give me a better idea of how much
work there is to do.~~ Done!
## IMPORTANT: Do **not** revert on 1-2 isolated post-submit failures.
While I've spent the last several weeks getting this passing all
presubmit tests, and some integration tests I suspected might be
affected, it is possible that there are 1-2 integration tests that will
fail as a result of landing this PR. I'll disable the flag
(`--no-explicit-package-dependencies`) if the failures look obvious
enough, otherwise I'll revert.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#163711
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: victorsanni
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: This is closing the tree. See
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux%20android_release_builds_exclude_dev_dependencies_test/889/overview
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: matanlurey
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {jonahwilliams}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163706.
Before this PR, the macOS workflow (or, others, but only macOS had a
test) would fail because it calls `refreshPluginsList` manually, and
sometimes it would be `determineDevDependencies: null` and sometimes
`determineDevDependencies: false`.
A value of `determineDevDependencies: null` was interpreted later on as
"find dev dependencies", which is not a safe operation. The only real
change in this PR is `bool determineDevDependencies = false`, so
omitting that parameter means we don't determine dev dependencies.
Added some tests, and opted-in an integration test that was failing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#140783
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: This broke presubmit (which was skipped using
`added this pull request to the merge queue 2 hours ago`).
See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162715. Adding to the
merge queue manually is _not_ safe currently.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: ueman
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {bkonyi}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
This makes various Flutter version information available at runtime.
It's basically the same as executing `flutter --version`. This is
especially useful for tools like Crashlytics or Sentry (see for example
https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-dart/issues/416).
Usage example:
```dart
FlutterVersion.version; // 3.16.5
FlutterVersion.channel; // stable
FlutterVersion.gitUrl; // https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git
FlutterVersion.frameworkRevision; // 78666c8dc5
FlutterVersion.engineRevision; // 3f3e560236
FlutterVersion.dartVersion; // 3.2.3
```
This approach has prior art as seen in #134179.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/61814
<!-- *If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include
a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].* -->
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene#overview
[Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Chat
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163706.
Before this PR, the macOS workflow (or, others, but only macOS had a
test) would fail because it calls `refreshPluginsList` manually, and
sometimes it would be `determineDevDependencies: null` and sometimes
`determineDevDependencies: false`.
A value of `determineDevDependencies: null` was interpreted later on as
"find dev dependencies", which is not a safe operation. The only real
change in this PR is `bool determineDevDependencies = false`, so
omitting that parameter means we don't determine dev dependencies.
Added some tests, and opted-in an integration test that was failing.
Tests under the `general.shard` have a 2000ms timeout and these tests
write to the real file system and watch directories for changes. This
can be slow on heavily loaded machines and cause flaky failures.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163329
Tested locally to ensure pressing 'd' in a running `flutter run` session
detaches and leaves Chrome open. Hitting 'q' or stopping with a signal
both terminate Chrome as expected.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nate Biggs <natebiggs@google.com>
If the Flutter SDK is updated we need to invalidate the widget preview
scaffold project to, at the very least, rebuild the precompiled
application. Similarly, if the root project's `pubspec.yaml` is updated,
the scaffold project's pubspec should be regenerated.
This change adds a `preview_manifest.json` to the scaffold project which
contains information related to:
- The manifest schema version
- The Dart SDK version the project was generated with
- The last known hash of the root project's pubspec.yaml
This information is used to determine whether or not the scaffold
project needs to be regenerated or the scaffold pubspec needs to be
updated to reflect changes to the root project's pubspec since the
previewer was last run.
Related to #162103
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162399.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163272.
`refreshPluginsList` is commonly called in iOS/macOS apps, more times
than you expect (and load bearing);
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/157391.
With `--explicit-package-dependencies`, we no longer write (or compare)
the output of `.flutter-plugins`. The iOS/macOS workflows required `pod
install` output to be invalidated when plugins when change, but the
logic that was being used to see if plugins changed _only_ worked for
the `.flutter-plugins` file format.
In the original code:
```txt
# oldPluginsFileStringContent
{"info":"This is a generated file; do not edit or check into version control.","plugins":{"ios":[{"name":"integration_test","path":"/Users/matanl/Developer/flutter/packages/integration_test/","native_build":true,"dependencies":[],"dev_dependency":false},{"name":"ios_objc_cocoapods_plugin","path":"/var/folders/qw/qw_3qd1x4kz5w975jhdq4k58007b7h/T/swift_package_manager_enabled.XrEWXS/ios_objc_cocoapods_plugin/","native_build":true,"dependencies":[],"dev_dependency":false}],"android":[{"name":"integration_test","path":"/Users/matanl/Developer/flutter/packages/integration_test/","native_build":true,"dependencies":[],"dev_dependency":false}],"macos":[],"linux":[],"windows":[],"web":[]},"dependencyGraph":[{"name":"integration_test","dependencies":[]},{"name":"ios_objc_cocoapods_plugin","dependencies":[]}],"date_created":"2025-02-13 17:01:11.023097","version":"3.30.0-1.0.pre.163","swift_package_manager_enabled":{"ios":true,"macos":false}}
# pluginsMap
{ios: [{name: integration_test, path: /Users/matanl/Developer/flutter/packages/integration_test/, native_build: true, dependencies: [], dev_dependency: false}, {name: ios_objc_cocoapods_plugin, path: /var/folders/qw/qw_3qd1x4kz5w975jhdq4k58007b7h/T/swift_package_manager_enabled.XrEWXS/ios_objc_cocoapods_plugin/, native_build: true, dependencies: [], dev_dependency: false}], android: [{name: integration_test, path: /Users/matanl/Developer/flutter/packages/integration_test/, native_build: true, dependencies: [], dev_dependency: false}], macos: [], linux: [], windows: [], web: []}
```
As you can see, `pluginsChanged =
oldPluginsFileStringContent.contains(pluginsMap.toString());` was
_always_ `false`, but we never knew because we'd always just fall back
to using the `.flutter-plugins` content comparison (which always
worked).
I added a test as well.
This also appears to fix
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162399.
/cc @jmagman @jonahwilliams
The existing code assumed that DWDS needed to initialize some of the JS
state between adding all the scripts to queue and when they are loaded.
A closer examination of the existing AMD module format bootstrapper
shows that we already only initialize DWDS' JS state after all the
scripts are loaded. This is because it waits for the entrypoint to be
loaded before initializing that state, and the entrypoint is only loaded
after all its dependencies are loaded, which includes the SDK and
transitively every file in the app.
Since it's simpler and avoids the double-gating to call main, this
change moves that initialization to after all the scripts are loaded and
aligns with the AMD module bootstrapper.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
`flutter widget-preview start --web` will cause the widget preview
scaffold to be run as a Flutter Web application using experimental hot
reload support. This will eventually be the default, with the desktop
environment being put behind a flag for use as a fallback under the
assumption that the desktop environment will be removed in the future.
- Adds better instructions for hot reload (if using the right flags),
hot restart, quitting, clearing, and more. These were already being
printed when using the VM, so this aligns with that.
- Adds an extra parameter for `CommandHelp` to `ResidentRunner` so
`ResidentWebRunner` can pass a version of it that uses its separate
logger and not `globals`. In order to support this, classes up the stack
also provide a `Terminal`, `Platform`, and `OutputPreferences`.
- Fixes up use of `globals` from an earlier change to implement hot
reload to use the logger instead. Same with `globals.platform`.
- Adds tests to check that only hot restart is printed when not using
the extra front-end flags, and both hot restart and hot reload is
printed when you are.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
I happened to run into this while chasing other bugs, and noticed
`.flutter-plugins-dependencies` is omitted.
I am guessing this is probably quite stale, but something something
[Chesterton's
fence](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chesterton%27s_fence), and added
tests.
- Delete code paths that handle screenshots for the HTML renderer
- Delete artifact enums for the HTML/AUTO renderers (and all their
usages).
- Remove HTML/AUTO renderers warnings.
- Delete the HTML/AUTO renderer enums (and all their usages).
- Delete tests for all the above.
`generateLocalizations` should fail (`flutter gen-l10n`) if `flutter:
generate:` does not exist.
The previous logic was faulty, because it was totally possible to
opt-out of synthetic packages (i.e. in a `l10n.yaml` file), but still
not be specifying `flutter: generate:`, which I _believe_ is supposed to
still be an error.
This came up in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/160289 as
`flutter config --explicit-package-dependencies` is enabled by default,
as the error is no longer thrown. Made a few other small test
forward-fixes that otherwise would break with the switch (but are
expected) as well.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162846.
At HEAD, including before this PR, it was impossible to use, or pass-in,
an unsound null-safety mode, but we still had code checking for it, and
reported analytics (I think? Some of these are `package:usage` specific
which is defunct).
This PR eradicates the otherwise unused code.
