This reverts commit aed4bfd318f189d648e595b89442fc19e3147b47.
`flutter_packaging` builders only should run on `stable` or `beta`, the original definition was correct.
This pull request is created by [automatic cherry pick workflow](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Flutter-Cherrypick-Process.md#automatically-creates-a-cherry-pick-request)
Please fill in the form below, and a flutter domain expert will evaluate this cherry pick request.
### Issue Link:
What is the link to the issue this cherry-pick is addressing?
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168745
### Changelog Description:
Explain this cherry pick in one line that is accessible to most Flutter developers. See [best practices](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Hotfix-Documentation-Best-Practices.md) for examples
N/A - Internal CI infra change.
### Impact Description:
What is the impact (ex. visual jank on Samsung phones, app crash, cannot ship an iOS app)? Does it impact development (ex. flutter doctor crashes when Android Studio is installed), or the shipping production app (the app crashes on launch)
Allows removing legacy logic in the `flutter_release_builder` recipe.
### Workaround:
Is there a workaround for this issue?
N/A
### Risk:
What is the risk level of this cherry-pick?
### Test Coverage:
Are you confident that your fix is well-tested by automated tests?
### Validation Steps:
What are the steps to validate that this fix works?
Merge on the candidate branch and observe post-submits.
This pull request is created by [automatic cherry pick workflow](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Flutter-Cherrypick-Process.md#automatically-creates-a-cherry-pick-request)
Please fill in the form below, and a flutter domain expert will evaluate this cherry pick request.
### Issue Link:
What is the link to the issue this cherry-pick is addressing?
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168709.
### Changelog Description:
Explain this cherry pick in one line that is accessible to most Flutter developers. See [best practices](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Hotfix-Documentation-Best-Practices.md) for examples
N/A (CI Infra Change)
### Impact Description:
What is the impact (ex. visual jank on Samsung phones, app crash, cannot ship an iOS app)? Does it impact development (ex. flutter doctor crashes when Android Studio is installed), or the shipping production app (the app crashes on launch)
Not user facing - this fixes API doc generation for release candidate branches, which was accidentally broken in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/162557.
### Workaround:
Is there a workaround for this issue?
N/A
### Risk:
What is the risk level of this cherry-pick?
### Test Coverage:
Are you confident that your fix is well-tested by automated tests?
### Validation Steps:
What are the steps to validate that this fix works?
Merge a commit to `flutter-3.32-candidate.0` and observe the post-submits.
This pull request is created by [automatic cherry pick workflow](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Flutter-Cherrypick-Process.md#automatically-creates-a-cherry-pick-request)
Please fill in the form below, and a flutter domain expert will evaluate this cherry pick request.
### Issue Link:
What is the link to the issue this cherry-pick is addressing?
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168088
### Changelog Description:
Explain this cherry pick in one line that is accessible to most Flutter developers. See [best practices](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Hotfix-Documentation-Best-Practices.md) for examples
N/A
### Impact Description:
What is the impact (ex. visual jank on Samsung phones, app crash, cannot ship an iOS app)? Does it impact development (ex. flutter doctor crashes when Android Studio is installed), or the shipping production app (the app crashes on launch)
N/A: Infrastructure only change.
### Workaround:
Is there a workaround for this issue?
N/A
### Risk:
What is the risk level of this cherry-pick?
### Test Coverage:
Are you confident that your fix is well-tested by automated tests?
### Validation Steps:
What are the steps to validate that this fix works?
N/A
This pull request is created by [automatic cherry pick workflow](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Flutter-Cherrypick-Process.md#automatically-creates-a-cherry-pick-request)
Please fill in the form below, and a flutter domain expert will evaluate this cherry pick request.
### Issue Link:
What is the link to the issue this cherry-pick is addressing?
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167755
### Changelog Description:
Explain this cherry pick in one line that is accessible to most Flutter developers. See [best practices](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Hotfix-Documentation-Best-Practices.md) for examples
N/A (CI Infrastructure Only)
### Impact Description:
What is the impact (ex. visual jank on Samsung phones, app crash, cannot ship an iOS app)? Does it impact development (ex. flutter doctor crashes when Android Studio is installed), or the shipping production app (the app crashes on launch)
Allows removing technical debt from Cocoon.
### Workaround:
Is there a workaround for this issue?
N/A
### Risk:
What is the risk level of this cherry-pick?
### Test Coverage:
Are you confident that your fix is well-tested by automated tests?
### Validation Steps:
What are the steps to validate that this fix works?
It is already live on the master channel.
This pull request is created by [automatic cherry pick workflow](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Flutter-Cherrypick-Process.md#automatically-creates-a-cherry-pick-request)
Please fill in the form below, and a flutter domain expert will evaluate this cherry pick request.
### Issue Link:
What is the link to the issue this cherry-pick is addressing?
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148968
### Changelog Description:
Explain this cherry pick in one line that is accessible to most Flutter developers. See [best practices](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/releases/Hotfix-Documentation-Best-Practices.md) for examples
Update CI configurations and tests to use either iOS 17 or iOS 18 devices.
### Impact Description:
What is the impact (ex. visual jank on Samsung phones, app crash, cannot ship an iOS app)? Does it impact development (ex. flutter doctor crashes when Android Studio is installed), or the shipping production app (the app crashes on launch)
Runs tests on either iOS 17 or iOS 18 devices.
### Workaround:
Is there a workaround for this issue?
No
### Risk:
What is the risk level of this cherry-pick?
### Test Coverage:
Are you confident that your fix is well-tested by automated tests?
### Validation Steps:
What are the steps to validate that this fix works?
N/A
Adds a new `widget_preview_scaffold.shard` directory which contains a
hydrated `widget_preview_scaffold` template. This will allow for us to
write widget tests against the widgets defined in the templates.
This PR doesn't add any widget tests and is only adding the ability to
run these tests in follow up changes.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/166416
The cost of bootstapping the initial PSOs can regress cold startup time
for customer money. As an experiment, attempt to defer PSO construction
to skia like.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Clarke <aaclarke@google.com>
Co-authored-by: gaaclarke <30870216+gaaclarke@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#165261
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jonahwilliams
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: bork the tree
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jonahwilliams
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {gaaclarke}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The cost of bootstapping the initial PSOs can regress cold startup time
for customer money. As an experiment, attempt to defer PSO construction
to skia like.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
The cost of bootstapping the initial PSOs can regress cold startup time
for customer money. As an experiment, attempt to defer PSO construction
to skia like.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Clarke <aaclarke@google.com>
Co-authored-by: gaaclarke <30870216+gaaclarke@users.noreply.github.com>
Update the comment in .ci.yaml with the issue link for easier discovery.
Related issue: #156506
Related discussion: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/162000
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This reverts commit 2a6b0158b229fce6f79bd1af6134181600d18b6f.
Revert "Skip Xcode install on mac_mokey Android tests (#163685)"
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/164408
Ready for review
~I think this pr is blocked by
https://github.com/flutter/cocoon/pull/4275 uploading a new artifact.~
then someone with cipd-writers access running `cipd set-ref
flutter/ktlint/linux-amd64 -ref version_1_5_0 -version <TBD ID>`
where id comes from
https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/ktlint/linux-amd64
To check if I had writer permissions I ran `cipd acl-check
flutter/android/sdk/all/ -writer`
To request permissions use go/flutter-cipd-write (googler only)
Successful run of linux analyze
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/try/Linux%20analyze/96415/overview
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
The .ci.yaml on a release branch may be missing builders that are active
on the latest master version of .ci.yaml. If a configuration based on
the release branch is pushed to LUCI, then CI will fail to schedule
those builders when run for a master branch PR.
S24 is only hooked up in the try pool at the moment, so this will fail
in the staging pool after landing, following which we can run the test
in a second PR in presubmit by changing `presubmit` to `true`.
For https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162639
fixes#162615
Evidance of passing.
https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build?taskFilter=cut&showBringup=true&repo=flutter&branch=master&showMac=false&showWindows=false&showiOS=false&showLinux=false
One failure is an unrelated tooling failure #163311
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This benchmark is a benchmark of the integration test binding which IMO
is not that important given that we continue to rely on flutter_driver
for actual performance metrics.
b/371020223
linux_android_emu and linux_android_emu_34 ran 2 different sets of
dependencies because the adoption of 35 was unstable. The reasons why
wound up being incompatible/bad versions of the build tool dependencies
like the graphics engine chosen was unstable on 35. This was fixed with
dependency changes.
Introduce an unstable linux android emulator configuration that can be
used to prove a dependency set as stable.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Windows is taking just longer than 30 minutes to finish this task. 45
minutes will keep us informed if it gets much longer without causing
lots of CI flakes. Mac and Linux versions of these tasks are finishing
well under 30 minutes so their timeouts are being left at the default.
