DDS was temporarily pinned to 4.1.0 because 4.2.0 triggered some test
failures (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147250). Those
failures should be fixed by vm_service 14.2.2, so this unpins DDS and
rolls both of these packages (along with devtools_shared, which is a DDS
dependency).
(If the bot updates vm_service before this is done, I can rebase over
that will reduce the size of this PR to just a few files)
## Description
This introduces a list of packages that we will explicitly not pin. It is to be used for things where the package isn't actually published, but is a transitive dependency of another package included in the SDK. This happens with the `macros` package, for instance, which depends on the private, unpublished, `_macros` package where the SDK does some tricky things to depend on it (it depends on "any", but ships it as part of the SDK).
Also ran `flutter update-packages --force-update` to update all of the pubspec files.
## Related Issues
- Fixes#147656
## Tests
- Added a test that makes sure that explicitly unpinned packages don't show up in the pinned list.
- added language for all code blocks
- replaced `bash` or `shell` with `sh` for consistency.
- added `sh` and `console` in the GitHub template link generator.
- updated test for GitHub template.
[A previous PR](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144279) implemented `const` constructors in the `Remote` class, so I wanted to follow up and use those constructors in the appropriate places.
This pull request aims for improved readability, based on issue #146600.
```dart
// before
Set<Color> _distinctVisibleColors() {
final Set<Color> distinctVisibleColors = <Color>{};
if (top.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(top.color);
}
if (right.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(right.color);
}
if (bottom.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(bottom.color);
}
if (left.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(left.color);
}
return distinctVisibleColors;
}
// after
Set<Color> _distinctVisibleColors() {
return <Color>{
if (top.style != BorderStyle.none) top.color,
if (right.style != BorderStyle.none) right.color,
if (bottom.style != BorderStyle.none) bottom.color,
if (left.style != BorderStyle.none) left.color,
};
}
```
Most of the repo should be covered in this PR (aside from `flutter_tools/`, since there was a lot going on in there).
The interface for `ArgResults` from `package:args` has added new fields. Change the implementations of these in the conductor to extend `Fake` so that these aren't analyzer errors.
This broke the pub roll here: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146642#issuecomment-2050169629
Originally, my aim was just to refactor (as per usual), but while messing around with the `TableBorder.symmetric` constructor, I realized that `borderRadius` was missing!
This pull request makes a few class constructors more efficient, and it fixes#144277 by adding the missing parameter.
<br>
This pull request fixes#143803 by taking advantage of Dart's null-aware operators.
And unlike `switch` expressions ([9 PRs](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143634) and counting), the Flutter codebase is already fantastic when it comes to null-aware coding. After refactoring the entire repo, all the changes involving `?.` and `??` can fit into a single pull request.
Part of work on [#101077](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141194). This is done as a separate PR to avoid a massive diff.
## Context
1. The `FakeCommand` class accepts a list of patterns that's used to match a command given to its `FakeProcessManager`. Since `FakeCommand` can match a list of patterns, not just specifically strings, it can be used to match commands where the exact value of some arguments can't (easily) known ahead of time. For example, a part of the tool may invoke a command with an argument that is the path of a temporarily file that has a randomly-generated basename.
2. The `FakeCommand` class provides on `onRun` parameter, which is a callback that is run when the `FakeProcessManager` runs a command that matches the `FakeCommand` in question.
## Issue
In the event that a `FakeCommand` is constructed using patterns, the test code can't know the exact values used for arguments in the command. This PR proposes changing the type of `onRun` from `VoidCallback?` to `void Function(List<String>)?`. When run, the value `List<String>` parameter will be the full command that the `FakeCommand` matched.
Example:
```dart
FakeCommand(
command: <Pattern>[
artifacts.getArtifactPath(Artifact.engineDartBinary),
'run',
'vector_graphics_compiler',
RegExp(r'--input=/.*\.temp'),
RegExp(r'--output=/.*\.temp'),
],
onRun: (List<String> command) {
final outputPath = (() {
// code to parse `--output` from `command`
})();
testFileSystem.file(outputPath).createSync(recursive: true);
},
)
```
I previously made a PR (#136140) that used `switch` expressions to make some parts of the Flutter codebase easier to understand. It was assigned to the framework team, and @christopherfujino let me know that it was too large to effectively review and recommended breaking it up into smaller pull requests.
Here's a PR that only targets files in the `dev/` directory. Hopefully this will be easier to work with!
(solves issue https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136139)
Analyzer's dependency on autosnapshotting causes issues.
Because every version of integration_test from sdk depends on leak_tracker from hosted and autosnapshotting depends on leak_tracker from path, integration_test from sdk is forbidden.
So, because autosnapshotting depends on integration_test from sdk, version solving failed.
