Updating the dart-lang/native dependencies to the ones published today.
No functional changes, but `CodeAsset` does not expose an `architecture`
and `os ` anymore (https://github.com/dart-lang/native/issues/2127).
Instead these should be taken from what is passed in for the
`CodeConfig`. This PR refactors the `DartBuildResult` to carry around
the `Target` with `CodeAsset`s as `FlutterCodeAsset`s.
(This PR avoid refactoring relevant code due to
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/164094 already refactoring this
code.)
## Description
This PR fixes a focus traversal issue for read-only TextField on macOS.
# Implementation details
On macOS, some editing capabilities are handled differently compared to
other platforms.
Since https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/105407, the macOS engine
send editing selectors to the framework.
To do so a text input connection should be opened.
Before this PR there was no text input connection for a read-only
EditableText which means several shortcut were not handled, especially
tab traversal (but also selection shortcuts using arrows).
After this PR an input connection is always created on macOS even if an
EditableText is read-only.
## Related Issue
Fixes [Read-only TextField prevents focus from
changing](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/161482)
## Tests
Adds 1 test.
Refactor: Migrate to Theme.brightnessOf method
fixes: #163837
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fix: Range slider show overlay for both thumbs on hovering one
fixes: #165281
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Unfortunately `10_google3_bug.yml` comes before `2_bug.yml`.
This changes the name (slightly) of the issue templates based on the
instructions from GitHub on what to do when you have 10+ issue templates
(as a side-note: I wonder if we need/still use umbrella bugs for the
feature tracker, or two types of performance bugs)
In the case of a multi-app scenario, different applications may store
files in different locations. In order to avoid reloading files that
were unchanged, a suffix can be added to indicate which "version" of
this file we're loading. Even if it has a different path, because the id
and "version" (which is URL(...).search) are the same, the file would
not be reloaded.
With Flutter tools, this scenario doesn't occur. The running application
ultimately does not need to worry about the same file in different
locations.
The benefit to avoid this caching is that the user only ever sees one
copy of every file, which is the latest version, instead of the current
behavior where a "gen=N" suffix is added to a newer version.
Note that this is unrelated to the XHR or its headers or any of its
caching mechanisms. The XHR is only used to fetch the *list* of changed
files, not the files themselves. The files get loaded as part of the
`appendChild` call.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/166294
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fix: Hero animation for page transition
fixes: #163989
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fix: DelegateTransition for cupertino sheet route
fixes: #163954
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Graph [stolen from Barteks
comment](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/161352#issuecomment-2611252732)
documenting the existing (pre pr) state:
```mermaid
graph TD;
flutter.groovy -- import --> native_plugin_loader.groovy;
flutter.groovy -- import --> BaseApplicationNameHandler.kt;
module_plugin_loader.groovy -- "ext" --> native_plugin_loader.groovy;
app_plugin_loader.groovy -- import --> native_plugin_loader.groovy;
include_flutter.groovy -- "apply from: " --> module_plugin_loader.groovy;
```
1. Converts the `app_plugin_loader.groovy` to kotlin source.
2. Converts the `module_plugin_loader.groovy` to kotlin script. This
can't be changed to kotlin source yet, as we will need to instruct users
to make a change to their host app-level gradle files before we can turn
down script application of this separate gradle plugin. This is a
breaking change, and will need a quarter at least of notice.
3. Unfortunately, the main Flutter Gradle plugin depends on being able
to call methods of the `native_plugin_loader`, which we could do in
groovy via wacky dynamic behavior, calling across the compiled
plugin->script plugin barrier. We can't do this in Kotlin source, and we
also can't fully convert `native_plugin_loader` to kotlin source yet
because of (2), so I've added a `NativePluginLoaderReflectionBridge`
that allows us to access the methods in the
`native_plugin_loader.gradle.kts` from the Kotlin source files, calling
across the compiled plugin->script plugin barrier as we were before.
The plan here is
1. to follow up by adding a converted `native_plugin_loader.gradle.kts`
in Kotlin source, and migrating all paths but the host-app using a
module-as-source to use the converted approach (but not deleting the old
way)
2. maintaining both ways for a release or two, with the script
application printing a message notifying users to update to the
non-script based application of the `module_plugin_loader`.
3. Then we can delete the script based apply, and also the reflection
bridge.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
Feat: Add brightnessOf method for theme
fixes: #163393
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
`BuildWebCommand` was accessing the value of `target` directly from the
argument parser rather than using the `targetFile` getter defined on
`FlutterCommand` which handles file paths provided in the positional
argument list.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136830.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165743
### Description
- Adds `rsuperellipse` to `mock_canvas.dart` to verify
`drawRSuperellipse` calls
- Adds tests for `paints..rsuperellipse`
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
Refactor: Migrate Date picker from MaterialState and
MaterialStateProperty to WidgetState and WidgetStateProperty
Part 1 of: #161052
Part 2 will contain addition of `selectedBackgroundColor` and
`selectedForegroundColor` which fully adds the requested feature.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
- **Inital conversion and single test case**
- **Task registered with name**
- **Test can handle multiple variants**
- **configuration for baseOutput setup**
- **Test passing**
- **formatting**
- **Use constant with upppercase**
- **Replace flutter.groovy version of
addTasksForOutputsAppLinkSettings**
Fixes#164393
Helpful commands:
`
JAVA_HOME=/opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/
./gradlew test --info --tests
"com.flutter.gradle.FlutterPluginUtilsTest"` from
packages/flutter_tools/gradle
`flutter test
test/integration.shard/android_gradle_outputs_app_link_settings_test.dart`
from packages/flutter_tools
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
There's currently a lot of code that handles RPC Errors that contain the
text "Service connection disposed" because the error originally did not
have a unique error code.
A new error code was added in
https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/381501 but it's not
currently used because it won't be caught by existing code.
This change updates all places that check for this text, and now also
handle the new error code in preperation for the code changing in
future.
See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/153471
cc @bkonyi
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
Issue listed, but this change does not directly fix it, it just prepares
for a related future change that will simplify handling these errors
without string checks
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
**Description**
This pull request fixes a minor documentation issue in the SliverList
reference, where a missing closing bracket ] in the ListView reference
could lead to confusion when reading the docs.
By correcting this, we improve the readability and clarity of the
documentation for Flutter developers referencing the SliverList widget.
**Why is this change needed?**
- Proper documentation is essential for developers to understand Flutter
widgets efficiently.
- The missing bracket could cause confusion for new contributors and
developers reading the API documentation.
- While this is a small fix, ensuring high-quality documentation aligns
with Flutter’s commitment to a great developer experience.
**Screenshot Before Fixing**
<img width="615" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-25 at 12 08 15 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d714d15d-5c78-46cf-8e7e-7347a788f9c7"
/>
**Screenshot After Fixing**
<img width="578" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-25 at 12 20 20 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/59dce920-1901-4d89-a598-f9e79a07a2d2"
/>
**Joining the Flutter Open-Source Community**
This is my first open-source contribution to Flutter, and I’m very
excited to start contributing more to the project! 🚀
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This PR introduces a `bool useSystemColors` parameter to the `ThemeData`
constructor.
The goal from this PR is to enable users to easily create high contrast
themes that are based on system colors for their `MaterialApp`:
```dart
MaterialApp(
theme: ThemeData.light(),
darkTheme: ThemeData.dark(),
highContrastTheme: ThemeData(useSystemColors: true, ...),
highContrastDarkTheme: ThemeData(useSystemColors: true, ...),
)
```
The `MaterialApp` widget will automatically pick the correct one of the
4 themes based on system settings (light/dark mode, high contrast
enabled/disabled).
Depends on https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/164933
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/118853
Current implementation runs timers and microtask callbacks in the root
zone. That assumes that the top-level `scheduleMicrotask` or `Timer`
constructors have been used, which have so far wrapped the callback with
`runCallbackGuarded` before calling the zone implementation.
That means that doing `zone.scheduleMicrotask` directly would not ensure
that the microtask was run in the correct zone. If a `run` handler
throws, it wouldn't be caught.
This change makes the `realAsyncZone` do whatever the root zone would do
if its `ZoneDelegate` got called with the intended zone and arguments.
That should be consistent with the current behavior, and be compatible
with incoming bug-fixes to the platform `Zone` behavior.
Prepares Flutter for landing
https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/406961
which is currently blocked (so this indirectly fixes
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/59913).
There are no new tests, the goal is that all existing tests keep
running, and that they keep doing so when the Dart CL lands. Currently
that CL only breaks one test, the
`dev/automated_tests/test_smoke_test/fail_test_on_exception_after_test.dart`
test which threw the error-after-test in the root zone instead of the
test zone. This change fixes that.
Fix: Remove attach target on deactivation of widget from overlay portal
controller
fixes: #164376
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
