This pull request aims to improve code readability, based on feedback gathered in a recent design doc.
<br>
There are two factors that hugely impact how easy it is to understand a piece of code: **verbosity** and **complexity**.
Reducing **verbosity** is important, because boilerplate makes a project more difficult to navigate. It also has a tendency to make one's eyes gloss over, and subtle typos/bugs become more likely to slip through.
Reducing **complexity** makes the code more accessible to more people. This is especially important for open-source projects like Flutter, where the code is read by those who make contributions, as well as others who read through source code as they debug their own projects.
<hr>
<br>
The following examples show how pattern-matching might affect these two factors:
<details> <summary><h3>Example 1 (GOOD)</h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (ancestor case InheritedElement(:final InheritedTheme widget)) {
themes.add(widget);
}
```
Without using patterns, this might expand to
```dart
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget widget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(widget);
}
}
```
Had `ancestor` been a non-local variable, it would need to be "converted" as well:
```dart
final Element ancestor = this.ancestor;
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget inheritedWidget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(theme);
}
}
```
</details>
<details> <summary><h3>Example 2 (BAD) </h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (widget case PreferredSizeWidget(preferredSize: Size(:final double height))) {
return height;
}
```
Assuming `widget` is a non-local variable, this would expand to:
```dart
final Widget widget = this.widget;
if (widget is PreferredSizeWidget) {
return widget.preferredSize.height;
}
```
<br>
</details>
In both of the examples above, an `if-case` statement simultaneously verifies that an object meets the specified criteria and performs a variable assignment accordingly.
But there are some differences: Example 2 uses a more deeply-nested pattern than Example 1 but makes fewer useful checks.
**Example 1:**
- checks that `ancestor` is an `InheritedElement`
- checks that the inherited element's `widget` is an `InheritedTheme`
**Example 2:**
- checks that `widget` is a `PreferredSizeWidget`
(every `PreferredSizeWidget` has a `size` field, and every `Size` has a `height` field)
<br>
<hr>
I feel hesitant to try presenting a set of cut-and-dry rules as to which scenarios should/shouldn't use pattern-matching, since there are an abundance of different types of patterns, and an abundance of different places where they might be used.
But hopefully the conversations we've had recently will help us converge toward a common intuition of how pattern-matching can best be utilized for improved readability.
<br><br>
- resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/152313
- Design Doc: [flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns](https://flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns)
This PR adds a new flag `default-flavor` in the `flutter` section of `pubspec.yaml`. It allows developers of multi-flavor android apps to specify a default flavor to be used for `flutter run`, `flutter build` etc.
Using `flutter run` on flavored apps already works without specifying `--flavor` already works on iOS (it defaults to the `runner` schema), so I (and others in #22856) figured this would be nice to have.
fixes#22856
This PR adds initial support for Swift Package Manager (SPM). Users must opt in. Only compatible with Xcode 15+.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146369.
## Included Features
This PR includes the following features:
* Enabling SPM via config
`flutter config --enable-swift-package-manager`
* Disabling SPM via config (will disable for all projects)
`flutter config --no-enable-swift-package-manager`
* Disabling SPM via pubspec.yaml (will disable for the specific project)
```
flutter:
disable-swift-package-manager: true
```
* Migrating existing apps to add SPM integration if using a Flutter plugin with a Package.swift
* Generates a Swift Package (named `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage`) that handles Flutter SPM-compatible plugin dependencies. Generated package is added to the Xcode project.
* Error parsing of common errors that may occur due to using CocoaPods and Swift Package Manager together
* Tool will print warnings when using all Swift Package plugins and encourage you to remove CocoaPods
This PR also converts `integration_test` and `integration_test_macos` plugins to be both Swift Packages and CocoaPod Pods.
## How it Works
The Flutter CLI will generate a Swift Package called `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage`, which will have local dependencies on all Swift Package compatible Flutter plugins.
The `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage` package will be added to the Xcode project via altering of the `project.pbxproj`.
In addition, a "Pre-action" script will be added via altering of the `Runner.xcscheme`. This script will invoke the flutter tool to copy the Flutter/FlutterMacOS framework to the `BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR` directory before the build starts. This is needed because plugins need to be linked to the Flutter framework and fortunately Swift Package Manager automatically uses `BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR` as a framework search path.
CocoaPods will continue to run and be used to support non-Swift Package compatible Flutter plugins.
## Not Included Features
It does not include the following (will be added in future PRs):
* Create plugin template
* Create app template
* Add-to-App integration
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348.
**Issue.** The `equals` implementation of `AssetsEntry` is incorrect. It compares `flavors` lists using reference equality. This PR addresses this.
This also adds a test to make sure valid asset `flavors` declarations are parsed correctly.
While we are here, this PR also includes a couple of refactorings:
* `flutter_manifest_test.dart` is a bit large. To better match our style guide, I've factored out some related tests into their own file.
* A couple of changes to the `_validateListType` function in `flutter_manifest.dart`:
* The function now returns a list of errors instead of accepting a list to append onto. This is more readable and also allows callers to know which errors were found by the call.
* The function is renamed to `_validateList` and now accepts an `Object?` instead of an `YamlList`. If the argument is null, an appropriate error message is contained in the output. This saves callers that are only interested in validation from having to write their own null-check, which they all did before.
* Some error strings were tweaked for increased readability and/or grammatical correctness.
Reverts flutter/flutter#132985
Initiated by: christopherfujino
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Provides support for conditional bundling of assets through the existing `--flavor` option for `flutter build` and `flutter run`. Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/21682. Resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136092
## Change
Within the `assets` section pubspec.yaml, the user can now specify one or more `flavors` that an asset belongs to. Consider this example:
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
flutter:
assets:
- assets/normal-asset.png
- path: assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- strawberry
```
With this pubspec,
* `flutter run --flavor vanilla` will not include `assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png` in the build output.
* `flutter run --flavor strawberry` will not include `assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png`.
* `flutter run` will only include `assets/normal-asset.png`.
## Open questions
* Should this be supported for all platforms, or should this change be limited to ones with documented `--flavor` support (Android, iOS, and (implicitly) MacOS)? This PR currently only enables this feature for officially supported platforms.
## Design thoughts, what this PR does not do, etc.
### This does not provide an automatic mapping/resolution of asset keys/paths to others based on flavor at runtime.
The implementation in this PR represents a simplest approach. Notably, it does not give Flutter the ability to dynamically choose an asset based on flavor using a single asset key. For example, one can't use `Image.asset('config.json')` to dynamically choose between different "flavors" of `config.json` (such as `dev-flavor/config.json` or `prod-flavor/config.json`). However, a user could always implement such a mechanism in their project or in a library by examining the flavor at runtime.
### When multiple entries affect the same file and 1) at least one of these entries have a `flavors` list provided and 2) these lists are not equivalent, we always consider the manifest to be ambiguous and will throw a `ToolExit`.
<details>
For example, these manifests would all be considered ambiguous:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/
- path: assets/vanilla.png
flavors:
- vanilla
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/vanilla/cherry.png
flavor:
- cherry
# Thinking towards the future where we might add glob/regex support and more conditions other than flavor:
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/**
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/**/ios/**
platforms:
- ios
# Ambiguous in the case of assets like "assets/vanilla/ios/icon.svg" since we
# don't know if flavor `vanilla` and platform `ios` should be combined using or-logic or and-logic.
```
See [this review comment thread](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/132985#discussion_r1381909942) for the full story on how I arrived at this decision.
</details>
### This does not support Android's multidimensional flavors feature (in an intuitive way)
<details>
Conder this excerpt from a Flutter project's android/app/build.gradle file:
```groovy
android {
// ...
flavorDimensions "mode", "api"
productFlavors {
free {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".free"
}
premium {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".premium"
}
minApi23 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi23"
}
minApi21 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi21"
}
}
}
```
In this setup, the following values are valid `--flavor` are valid `freeMinApi21`, `freeMinApi23`, `premiumMinApi21`, and `premiumMinApi23`. We call these values "flavor combinations". Consider the following from the Android documentation[^1]:
> In addition to the source set directories you can create for each individual product flavor and build variant, you can also create source set directories for each combination of product flavors. For example, you can create and add Java sources to the src/demoMinApi24/java/ directory, and Gradle uses those sources only when building a variant that combines those two product flavors.
>
> Source sets you create for product flavor combinations have a higher priority than source sets that belong to each individual product flavor. To learn more about source sets and how Gradle merges resources, read the section about how to [create source sets](https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#sourcesets).
This feature will not behave in this way. If a user utilizes this feature and also Android's multidimensional flavors feature, they will have to list out all flavor combinations that contain the flavor they want to limit an asset to:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/free/
flavors:
- freeMinApi21
- freeMinApi23
```
This is mostly due to a technical limitation in the hot-reload feature of `flutter run`. During a hot reload, the tool will try to update the asset bundle on the device, but the tool does not know the flavors contained within the flavor combination (that the user passes to `--flavor`). Gradle is the source of truth of what flavors were involved in the build, and `flutter run` currently does not access to that information since it's an implementation detail of the build process. We could bubble up this information, but it would require a nontrivial amount of engineering work, and it's unclear how desired this functionality is. It might not be worth implementing.
</details>
See https://flutter.dev/go/flavor-specific-assets for the (outdated) design document.
<summary>Pre-launch Checklist</summary>
</details>
[^1]: https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#flavor-dimensions
Provides support for conditional bundling of assets through the existing `--flavor` option for `flutter build` and `flutter run`. Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/21682. Resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136092
## Change
Within the `assets` section pubspec.yaml, the user can now specify one or more `flavors` that an asset belongs to. Consider this example:
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
flutter:
assets:
- assets/normal-asset.png
- path: assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- strawberry
```
With this pubspec,
* `flutter run --flavor vanilla` will not include `assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png` in the build output.
* `flutter run --flavor strawberry` will not include `assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png`.
* `flutter run` will only include `assets/normal-asset.png`.
## Open questions
* Should this be supported for all platforms, or should this change be limited to ones with documented `--flavor` support (Android, iOS, and (implicitly) MacOS)? This PR currently only enables this feature for officially supported platforms.
## Design thoughts, what this PR does not do, etc.
### This does not provide an automatic mapping/resolution of asset keys/paths to others based on flavor at runtime.
The implementation in this PR represents a simplest approach. Notably, it does not give Flutter the ability to dynamically choose an asset based on flavor using a single asset key. For example, one can't use `Image.asset('config.json')` to dynamically choose between different "flavors" of `config.json` (such as `dev-flavor/config.json` or `prod-flavor/config.json`). However, a user could always implement such a mechanism in their project or in a library by examining the flavor at runtime.
### When multiple entries affect the same file and 1) at least one of these entries have a `flavors` list provided and 2) these lists are not equivalent, we always consider the manifest to be ambiguous and will throw a `ToolExit`.
<details>
For example, these manifests would all be considered ambiguous:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/
- path: assets/vanilla.png
flavors:
- vanilla
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/vanilla/cherry.png
flavor:
- cherry
# Thinking towards the future where we might add glob/regex support and more conditions other than flavor:
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/**
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/**/ios/**
platforms:
- ios
# Ambiguous in the case of assets like "assets/vanilla/ios/icon.svg" since we
# don't know if flavor `vanilla` and platform `ios` should be combined using or-logic or and-logic.
```
See [this review comment thread](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/132985#discussion_r1381909942) for the full story on how I arrived at this decision.
</details>
### This does not support Android's multidimensional flavors feature (in an intuitive way)
<details>
Conder this excerpt from a Flutter project's android/app/build.gradle file:
```groovy
android {
// ...
flavorDimensions "mode", "api"
productFlavors {
free {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".free"
}
premium {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".premium"
}
minApi23 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi23"
}
minApi21 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi21"
}
}
}
```
In this setup, the following values are valid `--flavor` are valid `freeMinApi21`, `freeMinApi23`, `premiumMinApi21`, and `premiumMinApi23`. We call these values "flavor combinations". Consider the following from the Android documentation[^1]:
> In addition to the source set directories you can create for each individual product flavor and build variant, you can also create source set directories for each combination of product flavors. For example, you can create and add Java sources to the src/demoMinApi24/java/ directory, and Gradle uses those sources only when building a variant that combines those two product flavors.
>
> Source sets you create for product flavor combinations have a higher priority than source sets that belong to each individual product flavor. To learn more about source sets and how Gradle merges resources, read the section about how to [create source sets](https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#sourcesets).
This feature will not behave in this way. If a user utilizes this feature and also Android's multidimensional flavors feature, they will have to list out all flavor combinations that contain the flavor they want to limit an asset to:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/free/
flavors:
- freeMinApi21
- freeMinApi23
```
This is mostly due to a technical limitation in the hot-reload feature of `flutter run`. During a hot reload, the tool will try to update the asset bundle on the device, but the tool does not know the flavors contained within the flavor combination (that the user passes to `--flavor`). Gradle is the source of truth of what flavors were involved in the build, and `flutter run` currently does not access to that information since it's an implementation detail of the build process. We could bubble up this information, but it would require a nontrivial amount of engineering work, and it's unclear how desired this functionality is. It might not be worth implementing.
</details>
See https://flutter.dev/go/flavor-specific-assets for the (outdated) design document.
<summary>Pre-launch Checklist</summary>
</details>
[^1]: https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#flavor-dimensions
This adds avoid_dynamic_calls to the list of lints, and fixes all instances where it was violated.
Importantly, this lint is NOT turned on for flutter/packages/test, because those changes are happening in another PR: #84478
Allow configuring the flutter_manifest to support a synthetic package, this is done through flutter: generate: true.
When running pub get, insert a flutter_gen entry into the packages if it does not already exist. This points to .dart_tool/flutter_gen, which can be updated to contain the generated intl sources (But doesn't currently)
Adds an integration test that verifies this code can be run and imported when enabled.
Part of #60914
* Update project.pbxproj files to say Flutter rather than Chromium
Also, the templates now have an empty organization so that we don't cause people to give their apps a Flutter copyright.
* Update the copyright notice checker to require a standard notice on all files
* Update copyrights on Dart files. (This was a mechanical commit.)
* Fix weird license headers on Dart files that deviate from our conventions; relicense Shrine.
Some were already marked "The Flutter Authors", not clear why. Their
dates have been normalized. Some were missing the blank line after the
license. Some were randomly different in trivial ways for no apparent
reason (e.g. missing the trailing period).
* Clean up the copyrights in non-Dart files. (Manual edits.)
Also, make sure templates don't have copyrights.
* Fix some more ORGANIZATIONNAMEs
