Part of #137040 and #80374
The flag `throwOnPluginPubspecError` never actually was enabled during production in #79669, but only in some dart plugin tests. And in the tests the case of the error when enabling the flag was not explicitly tested. The only thing tested was, that it is not thrown when disabled.
As explained [here](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142035#discussion_r1484237904) the only case, where this error could be thrown is, when a dart implementation and a native inline implementation are provided simultaneously. But throwing an exception there is a wrong behavior, as both can coexist in a plugin package, thus in the pubspec file.
Disabling the flag means, that the error is not thrown and not shown to the user. This is the case in production (contrary to the dart plugin tests), which acts like these plugin cases of implementations are just skipped. And this is what actually should be done.
In conclusion, I think the case of coexisting dart and native implementation in pubspec was just overlooked and therefore this error validation was introduced, which is not necessary or even valid.
For more discussion, see: https://discord.com/channels/608014603317936148/608022056616853515/1200194937791205436
- This is tricky: I already added a test in #142035, which finally complies with the other tests, by removing the flag. So I think it falls in the category of "remove dead code".
- Theoretically this is a breaking change, as removing / altering some tests. But the flag actually was never valid or used, so IDK. But this may not does fall in the category of "contributed tests".
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
`DevFSBytesContent` (and it's descendant `DevFSStringContent`) have setters that change the underlying content. These are unused outside of tests, so this PR removes them. Amongst other things, this could help me refactor https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144660 into something that has fewer pitfalls.
This is purely a refactoring.
We should always target the newest, and 34 is the newest. This isn't a requirement yet (like it is for 33+) but presumably it will be made required in the nearish future.
Partial implementation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
This enables asset transformation during hot reload (except for web, because that has its own implementation of `DevFS` ð). Asset transformers will be reapplied after changing any asset and performing a hot reload during `flutter run`.
Explicitly handle the case where the iOS device is not paired. On `flutter run` show an error and bail instead of trying and failing to launch on the device.
On this PR:
```
$ flutter run -d 00008110-0009588C2651401E
'iPhone' is not paired. Open Xcode and trust this computer when prompted.
$
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144447
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144095
Originally, my aim was just to refactor (as per usual), but while messing around with the `TableBorder.symmetric` constructor, I realized that `borderRadius` was missing!
This pull request makes a few class constructors more efficient, and it fixes#144277 by adding the missing parameter.
<br>
Reverts flutter/flutter#143244
Initiated by: vashworth
Reason for reverting: Increased `flutter_framework_uncompressed_bytes` - see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144251
Original PR Author: vashworth
Reviewed By: {jmagman}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Replace `FlutterMacOS.framework` cached artifact with `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`. Also, update usage of `FlutterMacOS.framework` to use `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126016.
So far `flutter build web --wasm` was always stripping wasm symbols
except if `--no-strip-wasm` is passed.
=> Ensure that in profile mode we also keep the symbols
Replace `FlutterMacOS.framework` cached artifact with `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`. Also, update usage of `FlutterMacOS.framework` to use `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126016.
When the daemon throws an exception, the receiving client is unable to surface stack traces from the daemon.
This is because it is sent with the `trace` key here:
1e8dd1e4d6/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/daemon.dart (L308)
But the client tries to read it with the `stackTrace` key here:
1e8dd1e4d6/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/daemon.dart (L343)
Thanks to @mraleph for spotting this!
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
b/326825892
Part of #137040 and #80374
- Differentiate pubspec and resolution errors
- Rename platform to platformKey
- Add TODO for rework logic of flag [throwOnPluginPubspecError]
- Swap for loop: handle by platform and then by plugin
### Context:
DDC modules are abstractions over how libraries are loaded/updated. The entirety of google3 uses the DDC/legacy module system due to its flexibility extensibility over the other two (ES6 and AMD/RequireJS). Unifying DDC's module system saves us from duplicating work and will allow us to have finer grained control over how JS modules are loaded. This is a a prerequisite to features such as hot reload.
### Overview:
This change plumbs a boolean flag through flutter_tools that switches between DDC (new) and AMD (current) modules. This mode is automatically applied when `--extra-front-end-options=--dartdevc-module-format=ddc` is specified alongside `flutter run`. Other important additions include:
* Splitting Flutter artifacts between DDC and AMD modules
* Adding unit tests for the DDC module system
* Additional bootstrapper logic for the DDC module system
We don't expect to see any user-visible behavior or performance differences.
This is dependent on [incoming module system support in DWDS](https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/pull/2295) and [additional artifacts in the engine](https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/47783).
This is part of a greater effort to deprecate the AMD module system: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/52361
This pull request fixes#143803 by taking advantage of Dart's null-aware operators.
And unlike `switch` expressions ([9 PRs](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143634) and counting), the Flutter codebase is already fantastic when it comes to null-aware coding. After refactoring the entire repo, all the changes involving `?.` and `??` can fit into a single pull request.
This PR implements the functionality described above and hides it behind
the `--experimental-faster-testing` flag of `flutter test`.
### The following are some performance measurements from test runs
conducted on GitHub Actions
run 1 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/1
run 2 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/2
run 3 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/3
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/animation
test/foundation` step**
run 1: 54s
run 2: 52s
run 3: 56s
average: 54s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/animation test/foundation` step**
run 1: 27s
run 2: 27s
run 3: 29s
average: 27.67s (~48.77% shorter than 54s)
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/animation
test/foundation test/gestures test/painting test/physics test/rendering
test/scheduler test/semantics test/services` step**
run 1: 260s
run 2: 270s
run 3: 305s
average: 278.33s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/animation test/foundation test/gestures
test/painting test/physics test/rendering test/scheduler test/semantics
test/services` step**
from a clean build (right after deleting the build folder):
run 1: 215s
run 2: 227s
run 3: 245s
average: 229s (~17.72% shorter than 278.33s)
Note that in reality, `test/material` was not passed to `flutter test`
in the trials below. All of the test files under `test/material` except
for `test/material/icons_test.dart` were listed out individually
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/material` step**
run 1: 408s
run 2: 421s
run 3: 451s
average: 426.67s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/material` step**
run 1: 382s
run 2: 373s
run 3: 400s
average: 385s (~9.77% shorter than 426.67s)
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Field <dnfield@google.com>
Update: Accidentally use `--O4` instead of `-O4` in `dev/devicelab/lib/tasks/web_benchmarks.dart` update.
Original description:
* Make `flutter build web` have one option that determins the
optimization level: `-O<level>` / `--optimization-level=<level>` =>
Defaulting to -O4 => Will apply to both dart2js and dart2wasm
* Deprecate `--dart2js-optimization=O<level>`
* Disentagle concept of optimization from concept of static symbols =>
Add a `--strip-wasm` / `--no-strip-wasm` flag that determins whether
static symbols are kept in the resulting wasm file.
* Remove copy&past'ed code in the tests for wasm build tests
* Cleanup some artifacts code, now that we no longer use `wasm-opt`
inside flutter tools
Reverts flutter/flutter#143517
Initiated by: dnfield
Reason for reverting: broke CI, see https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux%20web_benchmarks_skwasm/3446/overview
Original PR Author: mkustermann
Reviewed By: {eyebrowsoffire}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
* Make `flutter build web` have one option that determins the optimization level: `-O<level>` / `--optimization-level=<level>` => Defaulting to -O4 => Will apply to both dart2js and dart2wasm
* Deprecate `--dart2js-optimization=O<level>`
* Disentagle concept of optimization from concept of static symbols => Add a `--strip-wasm` / `--no-strip-wasm` flag that determins whether static symbols are kept in the resulting wasm file.
* Remove copy&past'ed code in the tests for wasm build tests
* Cleanup some artifacts code, now that we no longer use `wasm-opt` inside flutter tools
* Make `flutter build web` have one option that determins the
optimization level: `-O<level>` / `--optimization-level=<level>` =>
Defaulting to -O4 => Will apply to both dart2js and dart2wasm
* Deprecate `--dart2js-optimization=O<level>`
* Disentagle concept of optimization from concept of static symbols =>
Add a `--strip-wasm` / `--no-strip-wasm` flag that determins whether
static symbols are kept in the resulting wasm file.
* Remove copy&past'ed code in the tests for wasm build tests
* Cleanup some artifacts code, now that we no longer use `wasm-opt`
inside flutter tools
Add column information as table header for `flutter emulators` command.
**Before:**
```
2 available emulators:
Pixel_3_API_30 ⢠Pixel 3 API 30 ⢠Google ⢠android
Resizable_API_33 ⢠Resizable API 33 ⢠Google ⢠android
To run an emulator, run 'flutter emulators --launch <emulator id>'.
To create a new emulator, run 'flutter emulators --create [--name xyz]'.
You can find more information on managing emulators at the links below:
https://developer.android.com/studio/run/managing-avdshttps://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/avdmanager
```
**After:**
```
2 available emulators:
Id ⢠Name ⢠Manufacturer ⢠Platform
Pixel_3_API_30 ⢠Pixel 3 API 30 ⢠Google ⢠android
Resizable_API_33 ⢠Resizable API 33 ⢠Google ⢠android
To run an emulator, run 'flutter emulators --launch <emulator id>'.
To create a new emulator, run 'flutter emulators --create [--name xyz]'.
You can find more information on managing emulators at the links below:
https://developer.android.com/studio/run/managing-avdshttps://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/avdmanager
```
fixes#140656
* Flags to `dart compile wasm`
Some options are not relevant to a standalone user of `dart compile
wasm` (e.g. specyfing dart-sdk, platform file etc). => Those aren't
offered by the `dart compile wasm` tool directly. => We use the
`--extra-compiler-option=` instead which passes through arbitrary
options to the dart2wasm compiler. => We don't maintain compatibility of
those options, if we update them we'll ensure to also update flutter
tools
* Binaryen optimization passes
This change will mean we use the binaryen flags from Dart SDK which are
slightly different from the ones in flutter.
* Optimization configuration
This change will also start using the more standardized `-O` flag for
determining optimization levels. The meaning of those flags have been
mostly aligned with dart2js (with some differences remaining).
* Minimization
Using the new optimization flags, namely `-O4` for `--wasm-opt=full`,
will automatically enable the new `--minify` support. Minification is
Dart semantics preserving but changes the `<obj>.runtimeType.toString()`
to use minified names (just as in dart2js).
* Code size changes
Overall this change will reduce wonderous code size by around 10%.
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/54675
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348.
**Issue.** The `equals` implementation of `AssetsEntry` is incorrect. It compares `flavors` lists using reference equality. This PR addresses this.
This also adds a test to make sure valid asset `flavors` declarations are parsed correctly.
While we are here, this PR also includes a couple of refactorings:
* `flutter_manifest_test.dart` is a bit large. To better match our style guide, I've factored out some related tests into their own file.
* A couple of changes to the `_validateListType` function in `flutter_manifest.dart`:
* The function now returns a list of errors instead of accepting a list to append onto. This is more readable and also allows callers to know which errors were found by the call.
* The function is renamed to `_validateList` and now accepts an `Object?` instead of an `YamlList`. If the argument is null, an appropriate error message is contained in the output. This saves callers that are only interested in validation from having to write their own null-check, which they all did before.
* Some error strings were tweaked for increased readability and/or grammatical correctness.
This is an attempt at a reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141396
The main changes here that are different than the original PR is fixes to wire up the `flutter test` command properly with the web renderer.
This is in service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141194
This will make it easier to get the `flutter run -d <browser>` and `flutter build fuschia` cases easier to get under test.
This is a direct revert of (the revert of (the reland of (the policy pr))): https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143132.
The only change is:
1. to put a conditional all on one line, because the packages repository has a test that uses an old flutter project to make sure nothing regresses. The old project uses an old gradle version, and the old gradle version bundles an old groovy version, and the old groovy version has a bug where lines that start with `&&` don't always work: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7218 (I enjoy that the revert reason ends up providing another strong justification to go forward with the policy). Also thanks to @reidbaker for pointing out this bug.
2. I also made a slight formatting change to the messages that print when out of the support bounds, which I think looks slightly better.
I tested this with on a branch that included a revert of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142008, and was able to recreate the failure and verify that it was resolved by 1).
