https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/issues/2584
Reassemble was being called in DWDS in the injected client until
v24.3.7. Flutter tools should now instead be the one to call the service
extension. Now that it's in Flutter tools, we can also report how long
it took. Similarly, we should update analytics on various things like,
whether there was a reload rejection, how long the compile took, and
more.
Adds test to check that these analytics are being reported correctly.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
The path to reload scripts JSON was being added to the global window
before. It should instead be passed to the provider on setup. In order
to do this, the baseUri calculation is moved into the WebAssetServer.
This is safe because Flutter tools was calculating it immediately
after creating the server anyways.
https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/issues/2584
Existing hot reload tests should test this behavior.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#161911
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Mid-air collision with another Flutter tool
update.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: bkonyi
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {andrewkolos}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
`flutter widget-preview start` will now look for functions annotated
with `@Preview()` within the developer's project. These functions will
be used to generate
`.dart_tool/widget_preview_scaffold/lib/generated_preview.dart`, which
inserts the returned value from each preview function into a
`List<WidgetPreview>` returned from a `previews()` method that is
invoked by the widget preview scaffold root.
**Example generated_preview.dart:**
```dart
// ignore_for_file: no_leading_underscores_for_library_prefixes
import 'package:foo/foo.dart' as _i1;
import 'package:foo/src/bar.dart' as _i2;
import 'package:widget_preview/widget_preview.dart';
List<WidgetPreview> previews() => [_i1.preview(), _i2.barPreview1(), _i2.barPreview2()];
```
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
`flutter widget-preview start` will now look for functions annotated
with `@Preview()` within the developer's project. These functions will
be used to generate
`.dart_tool/widget_preview_scaffold/lib/generated_preview.dart`, which
inserts the returned value from each preview function into a
`List<WidgetPreview>` returned from a `previews()` method that is
invoked by the widget preview scaffold root.
**Example generated_preview.dart:**
```dart
// ignore_for_file: no_leading_underscores_for_library_prefixes
import 'package:foo/foo.dart' as _i1;
import 'package:foo/src/bar.dart' as _i2;
import 'package:widget_preview/widget_preview.dart';
List<WidgetPreview> previews() => [_i1.preview(), _i2.barPreview1(), _i2.barPreview2()];
```
Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162201.
**NOTE**: This renames the environment variable to
`FLUTTER_PREBUILT_ENGINE_VERSION`.
---
We occasionally break ourselves, our users, and the Dart up (or is it
down? side-ways) stream repos (i.e. HHH) when we change how the
undocumented
[`update_engine_version.sh`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/bin/internal/update_engine_version.sh)
script, and it's Windows counterpart
[`update_engine_version.ps1`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/bin/internal/update_engine_version.ps1)
work, but have no way of knowing until N days/weeks later when someone
tells us.
For example,
<https://flutter-review.googlesource.com/c/recipes/+/62400>.
This is my attempt to encode "this is what you can guarantee by calling
this script".
It _still_ will be an internal only API that we might rev at any time,
but at least we:
1. Can tell the Dart team "this is tested and how it works"
2. If we want to change it, the tests will keep us from changing it
without informing folks it changed
These tests should (in theory) cover both Linux/MacOS and Windows.
/cc @a-siva
This gets us closer to enabling [hot
reload](https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/54934) on the web as
this format is a prerequisite. Historically, we added support for the
DDC module format only to enable hot reload, but that format is not
feasible for the goal, so we added the DDC library bundle format. The
DDC library bundle format is currently represented as the combination of
the `ddc` module format and `canary`. We no longer need to support the
old DDC module format.
- Adds build artifacts to build the SDKs for this format (but only in
sound mode as unsound is unsupported), and removes said artifacts for
the DDC module format.
- Update artifact maps and constants to add the new format and remove
the old format.
- Adds handling of the `canaryFeatures` flag.
- Update dwds to 24.3.0 and use the new
`FrontendServerDdcLibraryBundleStrategyProvider`.
- Add bootstrap code for the new format. Kept DDC module format
bootstrap code as it's used internally.
- Updates tests.
I ran `spinning_square` with the new module format to verify that it can
run.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
This PR rolls in a number of breaking changes from dart-lang/native:
* `BuildMode` is no longer part of the protocol, so Flutter no longer
passes it in.
* This means all code dealing with the name conflict between
`native_assets_cli.BuildMode` and `flutter_tools.BuildMode` has been
cleaned up.
* Also, the logs no longer mention the build mode.
* The tests still exercise both modes, because linking only happens in
release mode.
* `OS` is no longer part of the main protocol, but of the "code"
"protocol extension".
* The code now aligns more with `OS?` being nullable in a bunch of
places, since it is nullable if there's no code assets.
* The OS-specific config is nested in an object per OS.
* `CCompilerConfig`s fields are non-nullable now.
* So instead of passing an object with nullable fields around, a null
instead of the object is returned in various places.
* `FileSystem` is now passed in to the native assets builder.
This PR contains no feature changes.
This PR will need to be followed up by restricting what environment
variables are passed in (similar to
https://github.com/dart-lang/native/pull/1764), I will do this in a
follow up PR.
Tests:
* All existing features should be covered by existing tests.
Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160692.
Prior to `flutter_template_images: 4.3.0`, the `app_shared` directory
was required.
In 4.3.0 it was forked back out to `app`
(https://pub.dev/packages/flutter_template_images/changelog), as the
`skeleton` template has been removed, and the `skeleton` template was
the (only) reason for `app_shared` (to share code between `app` and
`skeleton`).
This is a NOP change tested by existing tests.
Almost all of the code is just adopting to changes to the APIs of
`package:native_assets_builder`, `package:native_assets_cli` and
`package:native_toolchain_c`
There's only two semantic changes
* Removes a test that checks for a verification error if a build hook
produces a static library if the preferred linking mode is dynamic:
=> The test is written in a very hacky way. By monkey patching the build
config.json that flutter build actually made. This monkey patching
relies on package:cli_config which is now no longer used.
=> The actual code that checks for this mismatch lives in
dart-lang/native repository and is tested there. So there's really no
need to duplicate that.
* The `package:native_assets_builder` no longer knows about code assets.
This is something a user of that package (e.g. flutter tools) adds. Now
the dry-run functionality will invoke build hooks who produce code
assets without an architecture.
=> The `package:native_assets_builder` used to expand such a code asset
to N different code assets (one for each supported architecture)
=> This logic was now moved to flutter tools. => In the near future
we're going to this dry-run complexity, which will then also get rid of
this uglyness (of expanding to all archs of an OS).
Reverts: flutter/flutter#156440
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Failing in post submit with
```
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743647] [STDOUT] stdout: [!] CocoaPods could not find compatible versions for pod "Google-Mobile-Ads-SDK":
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743695] [STDOUT] stdout: In Podfile:
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743718] [STDOUT] stdout: google_mobile_ads (from `.symlinks/plugins/google_mobile_ads/ios`) was resolved t
Original PR Author: flutter-pub-roller-bot
Reviewed By: {fluttergithubbot}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`.
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
Rolls native deps to the latest version, and cleans up deprecated field from template.
Tests:
* All the unit and integration tests for native assets. The template and dependencies are exercised in the integration test.
Since `package:native_assets_builder` already checks for having no static libraries as output, the custom check in flutter_tools is removed. The tests stubbing out the native assets builder exercising the custom check are also removed. (The integration tests now check for the error message from the native assets builder.)
