SkSL precompilation was only ever beneficial for iOS. For other
platforms, we recommended against it as Skia generated shaders per
target architecture which could be invalid on other devices. It is no
longer possible to use Skia on iOS.
Delete all Skia shader bundling logic.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/80091
Powered by the new and amazing `unnecessary_ignore` lint.
We're not enabling this lint by default because being able to
temporarily use ignores that don't ignore anything is a powerful tool to
enable migrations. We should turn this lint on locally periodically,
though, and clean up all outdated ignores.
dart_style 3.0.1 comes with some minor style fixes:
https://github.com/dart-lang/dart_style/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#301
This PR applies this fixes in bulk across the repository. (Otherwise,
the next person touching these files would have been the one updating
them to the new format by running the formatter).
This auto-formats all *.dart files in the repository outside of the
`engine` subdirectory and enforces that these files stay formatted with
a presubmit check.
**Reviewers:** Please carefully review all the commits except for the
one titled "formatted". The "formatted" commit was auto-generated by
running `dev/tools/format.sh -a -f`. The other commits were hand-crafted
to prepare the repo for the formatting change. I recommend reviewing the
commits one-by-one via the "Commits" tab and avoiding Github's "Files
changed" tab as it will likely slow down your browser because of the
size of this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kate Lovett <katelovett@google.com>
Co-authored-by: LongCatIsLooong <31859944+LongCatIsLooong@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR introduces a `NativeAssetsManifest.json` next to the
`AssetManifest.bin` and `FontManifest.json`. This removes the need for
embedding the native assets mapping inside the kernel file and enables
decoupling native assets building and bundling from the kernel
compilation in flutter tools. This means `flutter run` no longer does a
dry run of `hook/build.dart` hooks.
(It also means all isolate groups will have the same native assets.
However, since Flutter does not support `Isolate.spawnUri` from kernel
files, this is not a regression.)
Implementation details:
* g3 is still using kernel embedding.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142016 introduced an argument to
embed a `native_assets.yaml` inside `flutter attach` and `flutter run`
(the outer flutter process), but it is not used in `flutter assemble`
(the inner process when doing `flutter run`). So, those arguments need
to still be respected. However, all other logic related to embedding a
yaml encoding in the kernel file has been removed.
* All dry-run logic has been removed. 🎉
* The `KernelSnapshot` target no longer depends on the
`InstallCodeAssets` target. Instead, the various OS-specific
"BundleAsset" targets now depend on the `InstallCodeAssets` target. The
`InstallCodeAssets` invokes the build hooks and produces the
`NativeAssetsManifest.json`. The various "BundleAsset" commands
synchronize the `NativeAssetsManifest.json` to the app bundle.
* `InstallCodeAssets` produces a `native_assets.json`, which is renamed
to `NativeAssetsManifest.json` in the various "Bundle" targets. This
means that all unit tests of the "Bundle" targets now need to create
this file. (Similar to how `app.dill` is expected to exist because
`KernelSnapshot` is a dependency of the "Bundle" targets.)
* Because dynamic libraries need to be code signed (at least on iOS and
MacOS), the bundling of the dylibs is _not_ migrated to reuse
`_updateDevFS` (which is used for ordinary assets). Only the 2nd and 3rd
invocation of `flutter assemble` from `xcodebuild` has access to the
code signing identity.
Relevant tests:
* test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart - runs
`flutter run` with native assets including hot restart and hot reload.
TODO:
* Undo engine-roll in this PR after engine has rolled in.
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/154425
Related PRs:
* https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/388161
* https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/56727
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
Currently the `NativeAsset` target in flutter tools is responsible for
two things:
* performing the dart build (in the app as well as all transitive pub
dependencies)
* taking output (shared libraries) from this build and copying them
around
This intermingling of responsibilities leads to more complex code and
potentially unnecessary work: If the source code changed (e.g. `.c`
files change) we have to run the dart build again. But doing so may
result in the same shared libraries (e.g. adding comments to the `.c`
code). Currently we're going to copy the shared libraries despite them
having not changed, which then may cause upstream things to be dirtied
(if it's based on timestamp of files) and re-built.
Instead this PR splits this `NativeAsset` into the two orthogonal pieces
* `DartBuild` target that is responsible for the dart build
* `InstallCodeAssets` that is responsible for copying shared libraries
to the right place and producing a `native_assets.yaml`.
This decoupling is also preparation for a future where a dart build can
produce other kinds of assets (e.g. data assets) and is used in the web
build as well. (The web build would use `DartBuild` but not
`InstalCodeAssets`).
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/158012.
This is (effectively) a user-facing NOP, which is exchanging an
on-by-default command-line argument (`--implicit-pubspec-resolution`)
for an off-by-default global feature flag
(`explicit-package-dependencies`). It matches the mental model better,
is less painstaking to maintain and feed throughout, and will be easier
to globally flip on/off in a future PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Kolos <andrewrkolos@gmail.com>
Work towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/157819. **No behavior changes as a result of this PR**.
Based on a proof of concept by @jonahwilliams (https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157818).
The existence of this flag (which for the time being, defaults to `true`) implies the following:
1. The (legacy, deprecated) `.flutter-plugins` file is not generated:
https://docs.flutter.dev/release/breaking-changes/flutter-plugins-configuration
2. The (legacy, deprecated) `package:flutter_gen` is not synthetically generated:
https://github.com/flutter/website/pull/11343
(awaiting website approvers, but owners approve this change)
This change creates `useImplicitPubspecResolution` and plumbs it through as a required variable, parsing it from a `FlutterCommand.globalResults` where able. In tests, I've defaulted the value to `true` 100% of the time - except for places where the value itself is acted on directly, in which case there are true and false test-cases (e.g. localization and i10n based classes and functions).
I'm not extremely happy this needed to change 50+ files, but is sort of a result of how inter-connected many of the elements of the tools are. I believe keeping this as an explicit (flagged) argument will be our best way to ensure the default behavior changes consistently and that tests are running as expected.
Fix JS compilation to use the command 'compile js' instead of using
snapshot names to invoke dart2js
The Dart SDK is switching all tools to use AOT snapshots instead of JIT
snapshots and using snapshot names directly causes things to break.
This pull request aims to improve code readability, based on feedback gathered in a recent design doc.
<br>
There are two factors that hugely impact how easy it is to understand a piece of code: **verbosity** and **complexity**.
Reducing **verbosity** is important, because boilerplate makes a project more difficult to navigate. It also has a tendency to make one's eyes gloss over, and subtle typos/bugs become more likely to slip through.
Reducing **complexity** makes the code more accessible to more people. This is especially important for open-source projects like Flutter, where the code is read by those who make contributions, as well as others who read through source code as they debug their own projects.
<hr>
<br>
The following examples show how pattern-matching might affect these two factors:
<details> <summary><h3>Example 1 (GOOD)</h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (ancestor case InheritedElement(:final InheritedTheme widget)) {
themes.add(widget);
}
```
Without using patterns, this might expand to
```dart
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget widget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(widget);
}
}
```
Had `ancestor` been a non-local variable, it would need to be "converted" as well:
```dart
final Element ancestor = this.ancestor;
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget inheritedWidget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(theme);
}
}
```
</details>
<details> <summary><h3>Example 2 (BAD) </h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (widget case PreferredSizeWidget(preferredSize: Size(:final double height))) {
return height;
}
```
Assuming `widget` is a non-local variable, this would expand to:
```dart
final Widget widget = this.widget;
if (widget is PreferredSizeWidget) {
return widget.preferredSize.height;
}
```
<br>
</details>
In both of the examples above, an `if-case` statement simultaneously verifies that an object meets the specified criteria and performs a variable assignment accordingly.
But there are some differences: Example 2 uses a more deeply-nested pattern than Example 1 but makes fewer useful checks.
**Example 1:**
- checks that `ancestor` is an `InheritedElement`
- checks that the inherited element's `widget` is an `InheritedTheme`
**Example 2:**
- checks that `widget` is a `PreferredSizeWidget`
(every `PreferredSizeWidget` has a `size` field, and every `Size` has a `height` field)
<br>
<hr>
I feel hesitant to try presenting a set of cut-and-dry rules as to which scenarios should/shouldn't use pattern-matching, since there are an abundance of different types of patterns, and an abundance of different places where they might be used.
But hopefully the conversations we've had recently will help us converge toward a common intuition of how pattern-matching can best be utilized for improved readability.
<br><br>
- resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/152313
- Design Doc: [flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns](https://flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns)
Changes to original CL: The code that issues an error on unsupported
operating system in the dry-run case was missing a case for iOS and
Android
Original CL description
tl;dr Removes 50% (>1650 locs) of native asset related code in
`packages/flutter_tools`
Before this PR the invocation of dart build/link/dry-run was implemented
per OS. This lead to very large code duplication of almost identical,
but slightly different code. It also led to similarly duplicated test
code.
Almost the entire dart build/link/dry-run implementation is identical
across OSes. There's small variations:
- configuration of the build (e.g. android/macos/ios version, ios sdk,
...)
- determining target locations & copying the final shared libraries
This PR unifies the implementation by reducing the code to basically two
main functions:
* `runFlutterSpecificDartBuild` which is responsible for
- obtain flutter configuration
- perform dart build (& link)
- determine target location & install binaries
* `runFlutterSpecificDartDryRunOnPlatforms` which is responsible for a
similar (but not same):
- obtain flutter configuration
- perform dart dry run
- determine target location
these two functions will call out to helpers for the OS specific
functionality:
* `_assetTargetLocationsForOS` for determining the location of the code
assets
* `_copyNativeCodeAssetsForOS` for copying the code assets (and possibly
overriting the install name, etc)
=> Since we get rid of the code duplication across OSes and have only a
single code path for the build/link/dry-run, we can also remove the
duplicated tests that were pretty much identical across OSes.
We also harden the building code by adding asserts, e.g.
* the dry fun functionality should never be used by `flutter test`
* the `build/native_assets/<os>/native_assets.yaml` should only be used
by `flutter test` and the dry-run of `flutter run`
=> We change the tests to also comply with these invariants (so the
tests are not testing things that cannot happen in reality)
We also rename `{,Flutter}NativeAssetsBuildRunner` to disambiguate it
from the `package:native_asset_builder`'s `NativeAssetsBuildRunner`.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#155430
Initiated by: eyebrowsoffire
Reason for reverting: Postsubmit failures closing the tree. See the following examples:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_ios%20native_assets_ios/5738/overviewhttps://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_arm64_mokey%20native_assets_android/583/overviewhttps://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux_pixel_7pro%20native_assets_android/4075/overviewhttps://ci.chromium.org/u
Original PR Author: mkustermann
Reviewed By: {bkonyi, dcharkes}
This change reverts the following previous change:
tl;dr Removes 50% (>1650 locs) of native asset related code in `packages/flutter_tools`
Before this PR the invocation of dart build/link/dry-run was implemented per OS. This lead to very large code duplication of almost identical, but sligthly different code. It also led to similarly duplicated test code.
Almost the entire dart build/link/dry-run implementation is identical across OSes. There's small variations:
- configuration of the build (e.g. android/macos/ios version, ios sdk, ...)
- determining target locations & copying the final shared libraries
This PR unifies the implementation by reducing the code to basically two main functions:
* `runFlutterSpecificDartBuild` which is responsible for
- obtain flutter configuration
- perform dart build (& link)
- determine target location & install binaries
* `runFlutterSpecificDartDryRunOnPlatforms` which is responsible for a similar (but not same):
- obtain flutter configuration
- perform dart dry run
- determine target location
these two functions will call out to helpers for the OS specific functionality:
* `_assetTargetLocationsForOS` for determining the location of the code assets
* `_copyNativeCodeAssetsForOS` for copying the code assets (and possibly overriting the install name, etc)
=> Since we get rid of the code duplication across OSes and have only a single code path for the build/link/dry-run, we can also remove the duplicated tests that were pretty much identical across OSes.
We also harden the building code by adding asserts, e.g.
* the dry fun functionality should never be used by `flutter test`
* the `build/native_assets/<os>/native_assets.yaml` should only be used by `flutter test` and the dry-run of `flutter run`
=> We change the tests to also comply with these invariants (so the tests are not testing things that cannot happen in reality)
We also rename `{,Flutter}NativeAssetsBuildRunner` to disambiguate it from the `package:native_asset_builder`'s `NativeAssetsBuildRunner`.
We also reorganize the main code to make it readable from top-down and make members private where they can be.
tl;dr Removes 50% (>1650 locs) of native asset related code in
`packages/flutter_tools`
Before this PR the invocation of dart build/link/dry-run was implemented
per OS. This lead to very large code duplication of almost identical,
but slightly different code. It also led to similarly duplicated test
code.
Almost the entire dart build/link/dry-run implementation is identical
across OSes. There's small variations:
- configuration of the build (e.g. android/macos/ios version, ios sdk, ...)
- determining target locations & copying the final shared libraries
This PR unifies the implementation by reducing the code to basically two
main functions:
* `runFlutterSpecificDartBuild` which is responsible for
- obtain flutter configuration
- perform dart build (& link)
- determine target location & install binaries
* `runFlutterSpecificDartDryRunOnPlatforms` which is responsible for a
similar (but not same):
- obtain flutter configuration
- perform dart dry run
- determine target location
these two functions will call out to helpers for the OS specific
functionality:
* `_assetTargetLocationsForOS` for determining the location of the code
assets
* `_copyNativeCodeAssetsForOS` for copying the code assets (and possibly
overriting the install name, etc)
=> Since we get rid of the code duplication across OSes and have only a
single code path for the build/link/dry-run, we can also remove the
duplicated tests that were pretty much identical across OSes.
We also harden the building code by adding asserts, e.g.
* the dry fun functionality should never be used by `flutter test`
* the `build/native_assets/<os>/native_assets.yaml` should only be used
by `flutter test` and the dry-run of `flutter run`
=> We change the tests to also comply with these invariants (so the
tests are not testing things that cannot happen in reality)
We also rename `{,Flutter}NativeAssetsBuildRunner` to disambiguate it
from the `package:native_asset_builder`'s `NativeAssetsBuildRunner`.
There are three categories of binaries produced as part of the framework artifacts:
* Those that use APIs that require entitlements and must be code-signed; e.g. gen_snapshot
* Those that do not use APIs that require entitlements and must be code-signed; e.g. Flutter.framework dylib.
* Those that do not need to be code-signed; e.g. Flutter.dSYM symbols.
We are adding the third category in https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/54977. The Cocoon code signing aspect of this was handled in https://github.com/flutter/cocoon/pull/3890.
This ensures these files don't get copied into the build output should they appear in the artifact cache.
Issue: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/154571
As of Xcode 16, App Store validation now requires that apps uploaded to the App store bundle dSYM debug information bundles for each Framework they embed.
dSYM bundles are packaged in the FlutterMacOS.xcframework shipped in the `darwin-x64-release` tools archive as of engine patches:
* https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/54696
This copies the FlutterMacOS.framework.dSYM bundle from the tools cache to the build outputs produced by `flutter build macOS`.
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/153879
Turns out just supporting the right value for `kDebugMode` was a lot simpler than I thought. Debug builds used to never go through the build system code path when using `flutter run`, but now that we have wasm this can occur with the run command.
This should address https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148850
For the necessary background knowledge, see the flutter.dev content on [Resolution-aware image assets](https://docs.flutter.dev/ui/assets/assets-and-images#resolution-aware) and [Conditional bundling of assets based on app flavor](https://docs.flutter.dev/ui/assets/assets-and-images#conditional-bundling-of-assets-based-on-app-flavor) if you don't have a basic understanding of these features.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151813 by using unique temporary directories, per asset file, for transformations. Currently, only a single directory is used and the name of the temporary files was based only on the basename of files. This means that `assets/image.png` and `assets/2x/image.png` would share an output path (`<temp dir path>/image.png`), causing a race. If this quick and rough explanation is a bit confusing, the original issueâ#151813âprovides a full repro and correct identification of the exact cause of the failure that can occur in the asset transformation process.
This will make
* `flutter run` have source maps enabled by default
* `flutter build` have source maps disabled by default
which mirrors what happens already today with the js compilers.
For local development this works quite well - even better than with
dart2js (see dart2js issues in [0]).
We do have some follow-up items for source maps in dart2wasm compiler,
see [1]
[0]
[flutter/flutter/issues/151641](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151641)
[1]
[dart-lang/sdk/issues/56232](https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/56232)
If the user specifies the `--no-web-resources-cdn` or `--local-web-sdk`, we should use the local version of CanvasKit. `flutter.js` now has a flag that can be specified in the build configuration that tells it to load locally instead.
Also, added a link to the relevant docs in the web template warnings.
This addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148713
Also fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145559
Dart2wasm only needs a platform file, which contains the compiled
`dart:*` libraries. There's no need to specify a seperate `--dart-sdk`
option (anymore).
(See also https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/366821)
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148354
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/147142
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147144
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fix dependency tracking in the build.
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/147643
## Testing
It's not clear to me where to test the caching behavior of specific targets.
* test/general.shard/build_system/targets/common_test.dart
* This doesn't test the caching behavior of any targets
* test/general.shard/build_system/build_system_test.dart
* test/general.shard/cache_test.dart
* Both of these don't test specific `Target`s, these have `TestTarget`s.
* test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart
* This could work, but it's an integration test that already takes long to run.
This pull request aims for improved readability, based on issue #146600.
```dart
// before
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
final List<SupportedPlatform> platforms = includeRoot
? <SupportedPlatform>[SupportedPlatform.root]
: <SupportedPlatform>[];
if (android.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.android);
}
if (ios.exists) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.ios);
}
if (web.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.web);
}
if (macos.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.macos);
}
if (linux.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.linux);
}
if (windows.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.windows);
}
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.fuchsia);
}
return platforms;
}
// after
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
return <SupportedPlatform>[
if (includeRoot) SupportedPlatform.root,
if (android.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.android,
if (ios.exists) SupportedPlatform.ios,
if (web.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.web,
if (macos.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.macos,
if (linux.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.linux,
if (windows.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.windows,
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.fuchsia,
];
}
```
Uses kernel concatenation to concatenate the `program.dill` and `native_assets.dill`.
This will enable compiling `native_assets.dill` after `program.dill` so that tree-shaking information can be used.
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146270
## Implementation choices
* We can either run the frontend_server twice as a process invocation (current PR), or keep the process running after the dart compilation and then shut it down after native assets compilation to kernel. Keeping the process running would require more coordination between different `Target`s.
* We can either chose to only do separate kernel file compilation in release (AOT) builds, or do it both for JIT and AOT (current PR). Doing it differently in JIT/AOT means more conditionals in lib/src/build_system/targets/, doing it single-shot in JIT might be more performant though.
Update: Both of these are mitigated by not running the kernel compiler process if there are no native assets at all.
## Implementation notes
This only updates `flutter assemble`.
The kernel compilation calls in `flutter run` do not require kernel concatenation. The native-assets-kernel-mapping in `flutter run` contains results from `--dry-run` invocations of `hook/build.dart` (and in the future `hook/link.dart`). These `--dry-run` invocations do not get access to tree-shaking information, so the `link` hook to be introduced later can be run before Dart compilation.
## Tests
* Updated the `Target`s tests to reflect the new implementation.
## Related CLs
* frontend_server support: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/363567
* Same PR for Dart standalone: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/362384
From https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348#issuecomment-2016047148:
> before we ship, we should add a printTrace to the tool about each asset transformer we're invoking and the path/arguments we called it with
I think this is a good idea since asset transformers can be arbitrary Dart programsâmeaning that a lot can go wrong when running them. For example, they can hang indefinitely or perform some sort of I/O that later results in a tool crash. Knowing that asset transformation was involved when debugging a crash (or a slow/stuck `flutter build`) could be useful, so I think adding a `printTrace` or two is a good idea (or at least not a bad one).
This makes several changes to flutter web app bootstrapping.
* The build now produces a `flutter_bootstrap.js` file.
* By default, this file does the basic streamlined startup of a flutter app with the service worker settings and no user configuration.
* The user can also put a `flutter_bootstrap.js` file in the `web` subdirectory in the project directory which can have whatever custom bootstrapping logic they'd like to write instead. This file is also templated, and can use any of the tokens that can be used with the `index.html` (with the exception of `{{flutter_bootstrap_js}}`, see below).
* Introduced a few new templating tokens for `index.html`:
* `{{flutter_js}}` => inlines the entirety of `flutter.js`
* `{{flutter_service_worker_version}}` => replaced directly by the service worker version. This can be used instead of the script that sets the `serviceWorkerVersion` local variable that we used to have by default.
* `{{flutter_bootstrap_js}}` => inlines the entirety of `flutter_bootstrap.js` (this token obviously doesn't apply to `flutter_bootstrap.js` itself).
* Changed `IndexHtml` to be called `WebTemplate` instead, since it is used for more than just the index.html now.
* We now emit warnings at build time for certain deprecated flows:
* Warn on the old service worker version pattern (i.e.`(const|var) serviceWorkerVersion = null`) and recommends using `{{flutter_service_worker_version}}` token instead
* Warn on use of `FlutterLoader.loadEntrypoint` and recommend using `FlutterLoader.load` instead
* Warn on manual loading of `flutter_service_worker.js`.
* The default `index.html` on `flutter create` now uses an async script tag with `flutter_bootstrap.js`.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#144752
Initiated by: andrewkolos
Reason for reverting: compilation issue has turned the tree red
Original PR Author: andrewkolos
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino}
This change reverts the following previous change:
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
When invoking a package to transform an asset, we set `FLUTTER_BUILD_MODE` to the CLI name of the build mode being used. Inspired by https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101077#issuecomment-1890379501:
> Do transformers know whether they get executed in debug or release mode? I kinda imagine that being useful. Ex: There's a transformer that optimizes the file size of images. Depending on the amount and size of the images, that could take a significant amount of time. Therefore, I might want to only execute it in release builds.
Note for the reviewer: the interesting part of this change can be found in the commit [set environment variable to build mode when running asset transformer…](579912d470). The rest of the change is updating call sites with a new argument.
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
When invoking a package to transform an asset, we set `FLUTTER_BUILD_MODE` to the CLI name of the build mode being used. Inspired by https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101077#issuecomment-1890379501:
> Do transformers know whether they get executed in debug or release mode? I kinda imagine that being useful. Ex: There's a transformer that optimizes the file size of images. Depending on the amount and size of the images, that could take a significant amount of time. Therefore, I might want to only execute it in release builds.
Note for the reviewer: the interesting part of this change can be found in the commit [set environment variable to build mode when running asset transformerâ¦](579912d470). The rest of the change is updating call sites with a new argument.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143703
We need to make sure that when source maps are enabled for the dart2js target, it advertises the sourcemap file as one of its outputs so that the web release bundle can copy it over.
