Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/157359
Prevents Flutter.xcframework.dSYM from being copied into the App.framework folder. I am not 100% positive if there are cases where it's valid to have multiple dSYMs in that folder, so I'm just string matching and filtering out `Flutter.xcframework.dSYM`
Useful in tooling, releases, etc - where Dart is available
Example usages:
```bash
# Monorepo world
❯ dart ./dev/tools/bin/engine_hash.dart -s head
226e13826c7253c968d798666f323b1f207979f8
# Non-monorepo world
❯ dart ./dev/tools/bin/engine_hash.dart -s head
Error calculating engine hash: Not in a monorepo
```
Reverts: flutter/flutter#154061
Initiated by: QuncCccccc
Reason for reverting: might be the reason that cause Framework tree to red
Original PR Author: bartekpacia
Reviewed By: {gmackall, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR resolves#151166
This is simply removing unnecessary parenthesis from various places. This change is because of a change to the unnecessary_parentesis lint that will trigger there. Here is the CL https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/390161.
- https://github.com/dart-lang/linter/issues/4996
If anything else is needed please let me know.
I'd like to ask for this PR to wait a bit until the bots are run again on that CL so that I can be sure nothing else will trigger, I will come back here and update this whenever everything is complete. Thanks!
This pull requests adds a new `actionsPadding` property to AppBar, which controls the padding of the actions row's end. By default, no padding is added.
As it was already discussed in the linked issue below (https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/115349#issuecomment-1315582192), it is not feasible to change defaults. This PR is an interim solution to allow developers to change layout across the app, until that change/transition can be made (see: the new TODO line).
Different to the original code from 2018, this PR only adds padding to the actual actions row, instead of the entire `NavigationToolbar`.
Fixes#155747
Allows applying of `include_flutter.groovy` via the `apply from:` syntax, which allows using a host app that is using the Gradle Kotlin DSL (the default these days when creating an Android app in AS).
Explanation: The `include_flutter.groovy` script is currently not able to be called by Kotlin gradle files, because it is [intended to be invoked with the following lines](https://docs.flutter.dev/add-to-app/android/project-setup#depend-on-the-modules-source-code):
```
setBinding(new Binding([gradle: this])) // new
evaluate(new File( // new
settingsDir.parentFile, // new
'flutter_module/.android/include_flutter.groovy' // new
))
```
`setBinding` isn't part of the Kotlin gradle DSL, and there isn't (that I can find) an easy Kotlin equivalent. If this binding isn't set, the reference to `gradle` in `include_flutter.groovy` is wrong, which breaks the script.
This PR modifies `include_flutter.groovy` to also support being invoked through the standard way of invoking a script via the Gradle Groovy/Kotlin DSLs, which is `apply from:` (or it's slightly different Kotlin syntax). The start of the script identifies which of the two approaches is being used by checking if the binding is set, and then initializes some variables differently depending on the case.
If we land this, I believe we should update the example Gradle files for both the `kts` and `groovy` cases to prefer the `apply from` syntax as I think this is the syntax most developers would be more familiar with already seeing in their Gradle files.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/156456
There is a known long running test that has been bumping up against the default timeout. This adjusts the perTestTimeout for the devicelab tests to add 15 seconds to stop this from flaking.
The test is question: 82ebb74c64/dev/devicelab/test/run_test.dart (L76)
`test/run_test.dart: run.dart script prints a message after a few seconds when failing to connect (this test takes >10s)`
Cherry-picked padding changes from https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148856
Adds padding configuration options to `SearchAnchor`. This PR adds the following:
- `viewBarPadding`: The padding for items inside the `SearchBar` in the `SearchAnchor` view
- `viewPadding`: The padding to use around the entire `SearchAnchor` view
Working towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148852
This test waits on the application to print a message before
continuting, but that message does not reach the test post UI/platform
thread merge.
The test otherwise seems to function fine, and the app isn't crashing.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#156440
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Failing in post submit with
```
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743647] [STDOUT] stdout: [!] CocoaPods could not find compatible versions for pod "Google-Mobile-Ads-SDK":
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743695] [STDOUT] stdout: In Podfile:
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743718] [STDOUT] stdout: google_mobile_ads (from `.symlinks/plugins/google_mobile_ads/ios`) was resolved t
Original PR Author: flutter-pub-roller-bot
Reviewed By: {fluttergithubbot}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`.
This pull request aims to improve code readability, based on feedback gathered in a recent design doc.
<br>
There are two factors that hugely impact how easy it is to understand a piece of code: **verbosity** and **complexity**.
Reducing **verbosity** is important, because boilerplate makes a project more difficult to navigate. It also has a tendency to make one's eyes gloss over, and subtle typos/bugs become more likely to slip through.
Reducing **complexity** makes the code more accessible to more people. This is especially important for open-source projects like Flutter, where the code is read by those who make contributions, as well as others who read through source code as they debug their own projects.
<hr>
<br>
The following examples show how pattern-matching might affect these two factors:
<details> <summary><h3>Example 1 (GOOD)</h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (ancestor case InheritedElement(:final InheritedTheme widget)) {
themes.add(widget);
}
```
Without using patterns, this might expand to
```dart
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget widget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(widget);
}
}
```
Had `ancestor` been a non-local variable, it would need to be "converted" as well:
```dart
final Element ancestor = this.ancestor;
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget inheritedWidget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(theme);
}
}
```
</details>
<details> <summary><h3>Example 2 (BAD) </h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (widget case PreferredSizeWidget(preferredSize: Size(:final double height))) {
return height;
}
```
Assuming `widget` is a non-local variable, this would expand to:
```dart
final Widget widget = this.widget;
if (widget is PreferredSizeWidget) {
return widget.preferredSize.height;
}
```
<br>
</details>
In both of the examples above, an `if-case` statement simultaneously verifies that an object meets the specified criteria and performs a variable assignment accordingly.
But there are some differences: Example 2 uses a more deeply-nested pattern than Example 1 but makes fewer useful checks.
**Example 1:**
- checks that `ancestor` is an `InheritedElement`
- checks that the inherited element's `widget` is an `InheritedTheme`
**Example 2:**
- checks that `widget` is a `PreferredSizeWidget`
(every `PreferredSizeWidget` has a `size` field, and every `Size` has a `height` field)
<br>
<hr>
I feel hesitant to try presenting a set of cut-and-dry rules as to which scenarios should/shouldn't use pattern-matching, since there are an abundance of different types of patterns, and an abundance of different places where they might be used.
But hopefully the conversations we've had recently will help us converge toward a common intuition of how pattern-matching can best be utilized for improved readability.
<br><br>
- resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/152313
- Design Doc: [flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns](https://flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns)
Prior to this fix, `_TaskRunner.run` would immediately cleanup the
keep-alive port once the task completed, which would result in the
isolate shutting down as soon as the task result was returned from
`ext.cocoonRunTask` callback in the form of a
`ServiceExtensionResponse`. Since the service extension response is
processed by the service isolate, it was possible for the VM to start
shutting down before the service isolate could send the task result data
back to the task runner.
This change introduces a new service extension,
`ext.cocoonTaskResultReceived`, that the task runner invokes after it
receives the task result from `ext.cocoonRunTask`, notifying the task
process that it can close the keep-alive port and shutdown.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155475
