Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143173
The `start` and `end` parameters of `SemanticsController.simulatedAccessibilityTraversal` were deprecated in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/112413, but no tests were added that verified the new API. ð³
This change
- fixes a typo in an error message
- fixes the new `startNode` and `endNode` not being accounted for in setting the traversal range
- adds dart fixes for the deprecations
- adds tests for the new API that is meant to replace the deprecated one.
- Filed https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143405 to follow up on the new API not working in multiple views.
During golden test image comparison 2 lists of a different type are compared with the method "identical", so this will never be true. The test image is a _Uint8ArrayView while the master image is an Uint8List. So that results in always a heavy computation to get the difference between the test and the master image.
When you run this test snippet I go from 51 seconds to 14 seconds:
```dart
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
void main() {
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
testWidgets('Small test', (WidgetTester tester) async {
await tester.pumpWidget(Directionality(textDirection: TextDirection.ltr, child: Text('jo')));
await expectLater(find.byType(Text), matchesGoldenFile('main.png'));
});
}
}
```
Update the `matchesGoldenFile()` / `LocalComparisonOutput` code to generate failure images for golden tests that fail when the image sizes do not match. This can make it far quicker to identify what is wrong with the test image.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/141488
- [ x I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement].
Reverts flutter/flutter#142339
In the original change one of the tests included the same view twice which resulted in a different failure than the expected one. The second commit contains the fix for this. I don't understand how this wasn't caught presubmit on CI.
Reverts flutter/flutter#141484
Initiated by: eliasyishak
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
The existing `runApp` bootstraps the widget tree and renders the provided widget into the default view (which is currently the implicit View from `PlatformDispatcher.implicitView` and - in the future - may be a default-created window). Apps, that want more control over the View they are rendered in, need a new way to bootstrap the widget tree: `runWidget`. It does not make any assumptions about the View the provided widget is rendered into. Instead, it is up to the caller to include a View widget in the provided widget tree that specifies where content should be rendered. In the future, this may enable developers to create a custom window for their app instead of relying on the default-created one.
The existing `runApp` bootstraps the widget tree and renders the provided widget into the default view (which is currently the implicit View from `PlatformDispatcher.implicitView` and - in the future - may be a default-created window). Apps, that want more control over the View they are rendered in, need a new way to bootstrap the widget tree: `runWidget`. It does not make any assumptions about the View the provided widget is rendered into. Instead, it is up to the caller to include a View widget in the provided widget tree that specifies where content should be rendered. In the future, this may enable developers to create a custom window for their app instead of relying on the default-created one.
Much nicer calling API and simplifies evolving this API in the future.
I wish we could write a dart fix for this, but that's blocked on https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/54668.
The old doc says that, AutomatedTestWidgetsFlutterBinding for `flutter test` and LiveTestWidgetsFlutterBinding for `flutter run`. However, suppose we `flutter test integration_test/simple_test.dart` with the following code:
```
void main() {
testWidgets('hi', (WidgetTester tester) async {
print('hi ${TestWidgetsFlutterBinding.instance} ${Platform.operatingSystem}');
});
}
```
We will see: `hi <IntegrationTestWidgetsFlutterBinding> ios`. Therefore, we see `IntegrationTestWidgetsFlutterBinding` is used in a `flutter test` command, which is contrary to the documentation.
This reverts commit
d24c01bd0c.
The original change was reverted because it caused some apps to get
stuck on the splash screen on some phones.
An investigation determined that this was due to a rounding error.
Example: The device reports a physical size of 1008.0 x 2198.0 with a
dpr of 1.912500023841858. Flutter would translate that to a logical size
of 527.0588169589221 x 1149.2810314243163 and use that as the input for
its layout algorithm. Since the constraints here are tight, the layout
algorithm would determine that the resulting logical size of the root
render object must be 527.0588169589221 x 1149.2810314243163.
Translating this back to physical pixels by applying the dpr resulted in
a physical size of 1007.9999999999999 x 2198.0 for the frame. Android
now rejected that frame because it didn't match the expected size of
1008.0 x 2198.0 and since no frame had been rendered would never take
down the splash screen.
Prior to dynamically sized views, this wasn't an issue because we would
hard-code the frame size to whatever the requested size was.
Changes in this PR over the original PR:
* The issue has been fixed now by constraining the calculated physical
size to the input physical constraints which makes sure that we always
end up with a size that is acceptable to the operating system.
* The `ViewConfiguration` was refactored to use the slightly more
convenient `BoxConstraints` over the `ViewConstraints` to represent
constraints. Both essentially represent the same thing, but
`BoxConstraints` are more powerful and we avoid a couple of translations
between the two by translating the` ViewConstraints` from the
`FlutterView` to `BoxConstraints` directly when the `ViewConfiguration`
is created.
All changes over the original PR are contained in the second commit of
this PR.
Fixes b/316813075
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134501.
Reverts flutter/flutter#139717
Initiated by: LongCatIsLooong
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131435, #104594, #43400
Needs https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/48774 (to fix the web test failure).
Currently the method we use for text span hit testing `TextPainter.getPositionForOffset` always returns the closest `TextPosition`, even when the given offset is far away from the text.
The new TextPaintes method tells you the layout bounds (`width = letterspacing / 2 + x_advance + letterspacing / 2`, `height = font ascent + font descent`) of a character, the PR changes the hit testing implementation such that a TextSpan is only considered hit if the point-down event landed in one of it's character's layout bounds.
Potential issues:
1. In theory since the text is baseline aligned, we should use the max ascent and max descent of each character to calculate the height of the text span's hit-test region, in case some characters in the span have to fall back to a different font, but that will be slower and it typically doesn't make a huge difference.
This is a breaking change. It also introduces a new finder and a new method `WidgetTester.tapOnText`: `await tester.tapOnText('string to match')` for ease of migration.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131435, #104594, #43400
Needs https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/48774 (to fix the web test failure).
Currently the method we use for text span hit testing `TextPainter.getPositionForOffset` always returns the closest `TextPosition`, even when the given offset is far away from the text.
The new TextPaintes method tells you the layout bounds (`width = letterspacing / 2 + x_advance + letterspacing / 2`, `height = font ascent + font descent`) of a character, the PR changes the hit testing implementation such that a TextSpan is only considered hit if the point-down event landed in one of it's character's layout bounds.
Potential issues:
1. In theory since the text is baseline aligned, we should use the max ascent and max descent of each character to calculate the height of the text span's hit-test region, in case some characters in the span have to fall back to a different font, but that will be slower and it typically doesn't make a huge difference.
This is a breaking change. It also introduces a new finder and a new method `WidgetTester.tapOnText`: `await tester.tapOnText('string to match')` for ease of migration.
This PR adds `String? identifier` to `Semantics` and `SemanticsProperties`. The `identifier` will be exposed on Android as `resource-id` and on iOS as `accessibilityIdentifier`.
Mainly targeted at #17988
Initial Engine PR with Android support: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/47961
iOS Engine PR: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/48858
### Migration
This change breaks the SemanticsUpdateBuilder API which is on the Framework<-->Engine border. For more details see [engine PR](https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/47961).
Steps:
part 1: [engine] add `SemanticsUpdateBuilderNew` https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/47961
**part 2: [flutter] use `SemanticsUpdateBuilderNew`** <-- we are here
part 3: [engine] update `SemanticsUpdateBuilder` to be the same as `SemanticsUpdateBuilderNew`*
part 4: [flutter] use (now updated) `SemanticsUpdateBuilder` again.
part 5: [engine] remove `SemanticsBuilderNew`
Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134501.
This change is based on https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/48090. It changes the `RenderView` to be dynamically sized based on its content if the `FlutterView` it is configured with allows it (i.e. the `FlutterView` has loose `FlutterView.physicalConstraints`). For that, it uses those `physicalConstraints` as input to the layout algorithm by passing them on to its child (after translating them to logical constraints via the device pixel ratio). The resulting `Size` that the `RenderView` would like to be is then communicated back to the engine by passing it to the `FlutterView.render` call.
Tests will fail until https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/48090 has rolled into the framework.
This updates the implementation to use the stopwatch from the Clock object and pipes it through to the TestWidgetsFlutterBinding so it will be kept in sync with FakeAsync.
Relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/138843 attempted to reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/137381 which attempted to reland #132291
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/97761
1. The original change was reverted due to flakiness it introduced in tests that use fling gestures.
* Using a mocked clock through the test binding fixes this now
2. It was reverted a second time because a change at tip of tree broke it, exposing memory leaks, but it was not rebased before landing.
* These leaks are now fixed
3. It was reverted a third time, because we were so excellently quick to revert those other times, that we did not notice the broken benchmark that only runs in postsubmit.
* The benchmark is now fixed
Reverts flutter/flutter#137381
Initiated by: Piinks
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
This updates the implementation to use the stopwatch from the Clock object and piping it through to the TestWidgetsFlutterBinding so it will be kept in sync with FakeAsync.
Relands #132291
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/97761
The change was reverted due to flakiness it introduced in tests that use fling gestures.
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/135728
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/137696
This will get the tree green again.
The problem is that `CustomSemanticsAction` has static state in it, and todays test seed order makes things unhappy.
Reverts flutter/flutter#135249
Initiated by: zanderso
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Changes golden tests on CanvasKit to use Layer.toImage instead of browser APIs for screenshots. This brings it more in line with other platforms and should also fix some async timing bugs with tests.
* Added `performAction` to `SemanticsController` as well as specific methods for specific actions
* Added a `scrollable` finder to `find.semantics` as a convenience method for `findAny(<all scrollable actions>)`
* Updated `containsSemantics` and `matchSemantics` matchers to also work on `FinderBase<Semantics>`
Closes#112413
Updates references to `finders.dart` in `controller.dart` to use a namespace. This enables us to make use of `finders.dart#find` in `SemanticsController` without anything being shadowed.
Fixes#136421
## Description
This removes all of the comments that are of the form "so-and-so (must not be null|can ?not be null|must be non-null)" from the cases where those values are defines as non-nullable values.
This PR removes them from the animation, cupertino, foundation, gestures, semantics, and services libraries. Each of them only had a few, so I lumped them together.
This was done by hand, since it really didn't lend itself to scripting, so it needs to be more than just spot-checked, I think. I was careful to leave any comment that referred to parameters that were nullable, but I may have missed some.
In addition to being no longer relevant after null safety has been made the default, these comments were largely fragile, in that it was easy for them to get out of date, and not be accurate anymore anyhow.
This did create a number of constructor comments which basically say "Creates a [Foo].", but I don't really know how to avoid that in a large scale change, since there's not much you can really say in a lot of cases. I think we might consider some leniency for constructors to the "Comment must be meaningful" style guidance (which we de facto have already, since there are a bunch of these).
## Related PRs
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134991
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134992
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134993
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134994
## Tests
- Documentation only change.
## Description
This removes all of the comments that are of the form "so-and-so must not be null" or "so-and-so must be non-null" from the cases where those values are defines as non-nullable values.
This PR removes them from the library in the repo that don't have anything to do with the framework.
This was done by hand, since it really didn't lend itself to scripting, so it needs to be more than just spot-checked, I think. I was careful to leave any comment that referred to parameters that were nullable, but I may have missed some.
In addition to being no longer relevant after null safety has been made the default, these comments were largely fragile, in that it was easy for them to get out of date, and not be accurate anymore anyhow.
This did create a number of constructor comments which basically say "Creates a [Foo].", but I don't really know how to avoid that in a large scale change, since there's not much you can really say in a lot of cases. I think we might consider some leniency for constructors to the "Comment must be meaningful" style guidance (which we de facto have already, since there are a bunch of these).
## Related PRs
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134984
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134991
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134992
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134993
## Tests
- Documentation only change.
