This analytics event only records the value of the plist entry on
`build` commands. This will give an idea of the proportion of users who
are disabling Impeller when shipping apps.
## Description
This PR adds a parameter to configure the input decorator hint fade transition duration.
This animation is not part of the Material specification.
Removing it was considered but it breaks internal tests (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/107406).
I also considered several ways to avoid the fade animation (setting duration to 0, removing the hint text, etc) but it breaks many existing tests that assumes the hint text to be visible.
To mitigate the issue in a non disruptive way, I set the default duration to 20ms (an arbitrary short value).
## Related Issue
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/20283.
## Tests
Adds 3 tests, updates 3 tests.
## Description
This PR fixes form fields in order to call the `onChange` callback when the form is reset.
This change is based on the work done in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/123108.
I considered adding the `onChange` callback to the `FormField` superclass but it would break existing code because two of the three subclasses defines the `onChange` callback with `ValueChanged<String>?` type and the third one defines it with `ValueChanged<String?>?`.
## Related Issue
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/123009.
## Tests
Adds 3 tests.
When it comes to startup profiling, it is very helpful to look at platform channels. `debugProfilePlatformChannels` today only works in debug and profile mode. Unfortunately, using profile mode is less accurate for startup profiling, because of the service isolate introducing additional overhead.
This PR allows this toggle to work in release mode. Note that there are two parts to `debugProfilePlatformChannels`:
- Adding timeline events
- Logging statistics about platform channels
I also considered adding a separate toggle to limit the scope of this change to the former, but that seems like complexity that we might not need at this time.
Towards #102189
## Description
This removes all of the comments that are of the form "so-and-so (must not be null|can ?not be null|must be non-null)" from the cases where those values are defines as non-nullable values.
This PR removes them from the widgets library.
This was done by hand, since it really didn't lend itself to scripting, so it needs to be more than just spot-checked, I think. I was careful to leave any comment that referred to parameters that were nullable, but I may have missed some.
In addition to being no longer relevant after null safety has been made the default, these comments were largely fragile, in that it was easy for them to get out of date, and not be accurate anymore anyhow.
This did create a number of constructor comments which basically say "Creates a [Foo].", but I don't really know how to avoid that in a large scale change, since there's not much you can really say in a lot of cases. I think we might consider some leniency for constructors to the "Comment must be meaningful" style guidance (which we de facto have already, since there are a bunch of these).
## Related PRs
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134984
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134991
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134993
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134994
## Tests
- Documentation only change.
Adds warning to `flutter create` command that checks if detected Java version is compatible with the template AGP and template Gradle versions. If a developer is building for Android and their Java version is incompatible with either the AGP or Gradle versions that Flutter currently supports by default for new Flutter projects, then
- a warning will show noting the incompatibility and
- steps will be shown to fix the issue, the recommended option being to configure a new compatible Java version given that Flutter knows we can support the template Gradle/AGP versions and updating them manually may be risky (feedback on this approach would be greatly appreciated!)
Given that the template AGP and Gradle versions are compatible, this PR assumes that the detected Java version may only conflict with one of the template AGP or Gradle versions because:
- the minimum Java version for a given AGP version is less than the maximum Java version compatible for the minimum Gradle version required for that AGP version (too low a Java version will fail AGP compatibility test, but not Gradle compatibility).
- the maximum Java version compatible with minimum Gradle version for a given AGP version is higher than minimum Java version required for that AGP version (too high a Java version will fail Gradle compatibility test, but not AGP compatibility test).
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130515 in the sense that `flutter create foo`; `cd foo`; `flutter run` should always be successful.
## Description
This removes all of the comments that are of the form "so-and-so (must not be null|can ?not be null|must be non-null)" from the cases where those values are defines as non-nullable values.
This PR removes them from the animation, cupertino, foundation, gestures, semantics, and services libraries. Each of them only had a few, so I lumped them together.
This was done by hand, since it really didn't lend itself to scripting, so it needs to be more than just spot-checked, I think. I was careful to leave any comment that referred to parameters that were nullable, but I may have missed some.
In addition to being no longer relevant after null safety has been made the default, these comments were largely fragile, in that it was easy for them to get out of date, and not be accurate anymore anyhow.
This did create a number of constructor comments which basically say "Creates a [Foo].", but I don't really know how to avoid that in a large scale change, since there's not much you can really say in a lot of cases. I think we might consider some leniency for constructors to the "Comment must be meaningful" style guidance (which we de facto have already, since there are a bunch of these).
## Related PRs
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134991
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134992
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134993
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134994
## Tests
- Documentation only change.
## Description
This removes all of the comments that are of the form "so-and-so (must not be null|can ?not be null|must be non-null)" from the cases where those values are defines as non-nullable values.
This PR removes them from the material library.
This was done by hand, since it really didn't lend itself to scripting, so it needs to be more than just spot-checked, I think. I was careful to leave any comment that referred to parameters that were nullable, but I may have missed some.
In addition to being no longer relevant after null safety has been made the default, these comments were largely fragile, in that it was easy for them to get out of date, and not be accurate anymore anyhow.
This did create a number of constructor comments which basically say "Creates a [Foo].", but I don't really know how to avoid that in a large scale change, since there's not much you can really say in a lot of cases. I think we might consider some leniency for constructors to the "Comment must be meaningful" style guidance (which we de facto have already, since there are a bunch of these).
## Related PRs
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134984
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134992
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134993
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134994
## Tests
- Documentation only change.
## Description
This removes all of the comments that are of the form "so-and-so (must not be null|can ?not be null|must be non-null)" from the cases where those values are defines as non-nullable values.
This PR removes them from the painting and rendering libraries.
This was done by hand, since it really didn't lend itself to scripting, so it needs to be more than just spot-checked, I think. I was careful to leave any comment that referred to parameters that were nullable, but I may have missed some.
In addition to being no longer relevant after null safety has been made the default, these comments were largely fragile, in that it was easy for them to get out of date, and not be accurate anymore anyhow.
This did create a number of constructor comments which basically say "Creates a [Foo].", but I don't really know how to avoid that in a large scale change, since there's not much you can really say in a lot of cases. I think we might consider some leniency for constructors to the "Comment must be meaningful" style guidance (which we de facto have already, since there are a bunch of these).
## Related PRs
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134984
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134991
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134992
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134994
## Tests
- Documentation only change.
Reverts flutter/flutter#134031
context: b/301051367
Looked at the error message from the broken TAP target, but seems like the failure might be non trivial to resolve. Would it be okay if we revert this for now while it is being triaged?
This PR modifies the web build slightly to create an `AssetManifest.json`, that is a JSON(base64)-encoded version of the `AssetManifest.bin` file.
_(This should enable all browsers to download the file without any interference, and all servers to serve it with the correct headers.)_
It also modifies Flutter's `AssetManifest` class so it loads and uses said file `if (kIsWeb)`.
### Issues
* Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/124883
### Tests
* Unit tests added.
* Some tests that run on the Web needed to be informed of the new filename, but their behavior didn't have to change (binary contents are the same across all platforms).
* I've deployed a test app, so users affected by the BIN issue may take a look at the PR in action:
* https://dit-tests.web.app
## Description
This removes all of the comments that are of the form "so-and-so must not be null" or "so-and-so must be non-null" from the cases where those values are defines as non-nullable values.
This PR removes them from the library in the repo that don't have anything to do with the framework.
This was done by hand, since it really didn't lend itself to scripting, so it needs to be more than just spot-checked, I think. I was careful to leave any comment that referred to parameters that were nullable, but I may have missed some.
In addition to being no longer relevant after null safety has been made the default, these comments were largely fragile, in that it was easy for them to get out of date, and not be accurate anymore anyhow.
This did create a number of constructor comments which basically say "Creates a [Foo].", but I don't really know how to avoid that in a large scale change, since there's not much you can really say in a lot of cases. I think we might consider some leniency for constructors to the "Comment must be meaningful" style guidance (which we de facto have already, since there are a bunch of these).
## Related PRs
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134984
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134991
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134992
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/134993
## Tests
- Documentation only change.
Reverts flutter/flutter#125927
context: b/300804374
Looks like a g3 fix might involve changing the names of widget on the customer app, and I am not sure if that would be the right approach forward. Putting up a revert to be safe for now.
Support for FFI calls with `@Native external` functions through Native assets on Linux. This enables bundling native code without any build-system boilerplate code.
For more info see:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129757
### Implementation details for Linux.
Mainly follows the design of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/130494.
Some differences are:
* Linux does not support cross compiling or compiling for multiple architectures, so this has not been implemented.
* Linux has no add2app.
The assets copying is done in the install-phase of the CMake build of a flutter app.
CMake requires the native assets folder to exist, so we create it also when the feature is disabled or there are no assets.
### Tests
This PR adds new tests to cover the various use cases.
* packages/flutter_tools/test/general.shard/linux/native_assets_test.dart
* Unit tests the Linux-specific part of building native assets.
It also extends various existing tests:
* packages/flutter_tools/test/integration.shard/native_assets_test.dart
* Runs (incl hot reload/hot restart), builds, builds frameworks for Linux and flutter-tester.
Speeds up the native assets target in the backend by
1. changing other targets `gen_dart_plugin_registrant` and
`release_unpack_ios` to do async I/O,
2. not reparsing the package config, and
3. not calling `dart pub deps --json` for 0 or 1 packages (fixed
package:native_assets_builder).
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134427
```
[ +2 ms] native_assets: Starting due to {}
[ +2 ms] Skipping target: gen_localizations
[ +1 ms] gen_dart_plugin_registrant: Starting due to {InvalidatedReasonKind.inputChanged: The following inputs have updated contents: /Users/dacoharkes/flt/engine/flutter/examples/hello_world/.dart_tool/package_config_subset}
[ +33 ms] gen_dart_plugin_registrant: Complete
[ +107 ms] release_unpack_ios: Complete
[ +60 ms] Writing native_assets.yaml.
[ +7 ms] Writing /Users/dacoharkes/flt/engine/flutter/examples/hello_world/.dart_tool/flutter_build/be2692bbfbc0b9a27fcd2422d52354c6/native_assets.yaml done.
[ ] native_assets: Complete
```
->
```
[ +4 ms] native_assets: Starting due to {}
[ ] Skipping target: gen_localizations
[ +1 ms] gen_dart_plugin_registrant: Starting due to {InvalidatedReasonKind.inputChanged: The following inputs have updated contents: /Users/dacoharkes/flt/engine/flutter/examples/hello_world/.dart_tool/package_config_subset}
[ +31 ms] Writing native_assets.yaml.
[ +8 ms] Writing /Users/dacoharkes/flt/engine/flutter/examples/hello_world/.dart_tool/flutter_build/f9451a65a465bfab70d004e21d6cc1d6/native_assets.yaml done.
[ +1 ms] native_assets: Complete
```
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene#overview
[Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Tree-hygiene#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/wiki/Chat
